Arkansas politicians, well, to be fair, Arkansas GQP
anti-LGBTQ+, transphobic politicians, are continuing their war on our trans
brothers and sisters because … ignorance, hate, fear, stupidity.
Last week the Arkansas Legislature passed House Bill 1749,
which would prohibit hormone treatments, puberty blockers and
transition-related surgeries for transgender minors, and for a hot minute it
looked like the bill would fail when Governor
Asa Hutchinson vetoed it, but then the GQP-controlled legislature
overrode the veto.
Now before you congratulate Hutchinson for being an ally, he
also said that while he did not like the bill, he didn’t believe anyone under
eighteen should be allowed to have gender reassignment surgery, so, yeah, not a
friend.
And now it appears the GQP feels emboldened to continue
their war on trans Americans, because they also passed a bill that says teachers
would not be required to address students by a name or pronoun inconsistent
with the student's biological sex.
The House's 62-21 vote—mostly along party lines—sends the
measure to the Senate. Two lawmakers voted present, and 14 didn't vote; fourteen
sat on their hands. But, in a surprise move, two Republicans, Frances
Cavenaugh and Jeff Wardlaw, voted no.
So, there are some in the party who see this bill for what
it is: hate.
It all began when GQP Representative Mary Bentley, who
sponsored the bill, claimed some teachers had raised concerns to her about
students who have changed their name or pronoun several times in a year, or use
three different names in as many classrooms, and fear that they'll be sued for
not addressing the child by their preferred name or pronoun:
"It's not compelling anyone's speech. It's not
prohibiting anyone's speech. It's helping those professors and teachers in our
schools that do not want to be sued for not using a certain person's pronoun.”
Really, Mary? I remember being in school, and on the first
day being addressed as Robert, and telling my teachers to call me Bob; it’s not
hard to call people by their names, and really not so hard to learn a person’s
pronouns. And it’s not so hard to remember he/him, she/her, or they/them.
Democratic lawmaker, the aptly named Fred Love says that
intentionally not referring to someone by what they want to be called is
"one of the most disrespectful things that you can do:
"That's one of the simplest decencies that we can give
someone. ... That's not hard. That's not difficult. That's just a bit of
decency and a bit of respect and I think that's what we need to do."
But then GQP Representative Mark Lowery told a story about a
"male student who wanted to be called by a female name" and was
referred to that way by teachers, even though the student’s parents would only
address the student by the birth name. That’s tough; but even Lowery admits
that this new Hate Bill does “not specifically address the example I'm giving
you.”
So, let’s go back to Mary Bentley, who pulled out that old
chestnut about students changing their name between classes or asking to be
identified as an animal:
"We have a real issue in our state, and I need our
districts to take a look at this and do more than this bill does. This bill is
just a first step to help protect our teachers but when we have students in
school now that don't identify as a boy or a girl but as a cat, as a furry, we
have issues."
Hey Mary, you bigoted fool please give one example of
a student asking to be identified as an animal. I’ll wait.
That’s what I thought. Oh, and to make one thing clear, this
isn’t about teachers being sued for misnaming or misgendering any student
anywhere, anytime, ever, because, even in Arkansas, no teacher has ever been
sued for that,
This bill is intended to make transgender, non-binary,
gender fluid students, less than, because politicians cannot wrap their heads
around the idea.
My name’s Bob. My pronouns are he/him, and I identify as
male, gay male,
That’s not so hard to remember and doing that for our trans
brothers and sisters goes a long way toward making everyone at least feel
equal. |
Why do teachers need protecting rather than the students who are far more vulnerable? If the teachers are fearful of being sued for using the wrong pronouns, perhaps the state would do better to insure teachers against that kind of suit? and what evidence is there of teachers being sued for this crime? I bet there's none at all.
ReplyDeleteFUCK BIGOTED IGNORANT REDNECK ARKANSAS!
ReplyDeleteWay back when I was in school, most teachers called their students by the last name, except for their pets.
ReplyDeleteIdiots. We have kids at our school who identify in ways other than their birth gender, and it's just not hard to remember what to call them or what pronouns to use!
ReplyDelete(They don't identify as a cat, though, I hasten to add.)
ReplyDeleteAnd what do we call politicians who obviously identify as assholes?!?
ReplyDeleteWith parents naming their children
ReplyDeleteall sorts of creative and unusual
names I used to have to keep a list
with their names phonically spelled
so I could pronounce their names
correctly. No cats though...
xoxo :-)
This. This is what they waste time and tax dollars doing? F them. It's the whole let's be divisive and then we won't have to solve any real problems. This is shirking their duties as lawmakers. This is some juvenile idiotic stuff. But then it's Arkansas... so, what would you expect?
ReplyDeleteIt's all for show. It's all for the 'constituents'. Bigotry made law, and then that will be of course contested. They do it to court the Evilgelicals.
ReplyDeleteXOXO
"I am TOO a Cat!!!"- Some 5 year old somewhere, not central Texas tho'
ReplyDelete