Showing posts with label Non-Discrimination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Non-Discrimination. Show all posts
Monday, April 17, 2017
Monday, January 28, 2013
The BSA Threatens to Kick Out Pack 442 For Supporting Gay Scouts .... The Pack Blinks .... Followed By An UPDATE
The Boy Scouts are all about building character; the kind of
character that says if you’re gay you don’t count, you don’t fit in, you don’t
matter. The kind of character that says if you want to practice tolerance, teach
tolerance, even be tolerant, you cannot be part of the Boy Scouts of America.
In Washington DC, the Boy Scouts council in charge of
overseeing scout programs is threatening to kick out a Maryland troop for posting
a statement on its website declaring it won't discriminate against gay scouts. That’s character. You are open and accepting of The Gays? Get out. And, um,
stay out.
Last September, the families of Pack 442, in Cloverly,
Maryland, anonymously voted and overwhelmingly approved to adopt a
non-discrimination statement. Non-discrimination; that's a good thing, or so I thought,
but then I am not a Boy Scout.
According to Theresa Phillips, committee chair of Pack 442,
the pack wanted approved the statement to show the Boy Scouts of America that
they “will not stand for the discrimination of homosexual minors or adults
whatsoever."
But after the statement was posted, the National Capital Area
Council [NCAC] demanded the pack strike it from their website. Theresa Phillips
says, “At first they [said] they would "allow" us to leave it up
based on our right to freedom of speech. Now they are doing a 180 and basically
asking us to either conform to BSA's discriminatory policy or get out."
Building character. And they don’t care who knows it. Les Baron, CEO and Scout
Executive of NCAC, says that if Pack 442 doesn’t erase the declaration,
"they will not be recognized as an organization, although that's our last
resort."
Um, but that appears to be their only resort as none of the
parties involve say any other offer or request was put forth. And, if Pack 442
doesn’t conform to BSA Intolerance and Hate, the troop will lose access to
member insurance, rank badges, and scout camps.
For being open and accepting of gay scouts.
As the BSA sees more and more corporate sponsors withdrawing
support of the group, and sees more and more grass-roots, non-discriminatory
alterna-scout troops forming, I hope they’ll see that their policy is
disgusting, hateful, wrong, and definitely not a character trait worthy of
anyone in the 21st century.
I had hoped that Pack 442 would follow in the footsteps of
scouts in Sebastopol, California, who lost their charter for refusing to drop a
similar statement, but as of this past Saturday, Pack 442 dropped the statement
from their website and has gone back to goose-stepping along with hatred.
UPDATE ….
According to NBC News this morning, the Boy Scouts of America [BSA] is
actively considering an end to its decades-long policy of banning gay scouts or
scout leaders. If adopted by the BSA board of directors, it would represent a
profound change on an issue that has been highly controversial.
The new policy would eliminate the ban from the national
organization’s rules, leaving local sponsoring organizations free to decide for
themselves whether to admit gay scouts. Deron Smith, a spokesman for the BSA,
says, “The chartered organizations that oversee and deliver scouting would
accept membership and select leaders consistent with their organization’s
mission, principles or religious beliefs [but individual sponsors and parents] would
be able to choose a local unit which best meets the needs of their families.”
Sounds good, though my guess is that the BSA hopes their individual
groups maintain their anti-gay policies.
Still, maybe now Pack 442 could restate their intent to be a
gay-friendly troop on their website, and maybe others will follow suit, and
maybe, after decades the BSA will actually be able to say they are teaching real character.
Thursday, January 24, 2013
Random Musings
![]() |
GOProud, that Gay conservative group which has never officially backed marriage equality, did so last week.
GOProud.
Always late to the party.
|
Labels:
Anti-LGBTQ+,
Asshat,
Beyoncé,
Bob,
Carlos,
Democrat,
Funny,
Gay Bar,
GOProud,
Inauguration Day,
Kentucky,
LGBTQ+,
Marriage Equality,
Musings,
New Mexico,
Non-Discrimination,
President Obama,
The Castro,
X
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Missoula, Montana Doing The Right Thing

Very early yesterday morning, the Missoula City Council adopted the first equality ordinance in all of Montana that protects people from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
"Most of us can't remember civil rights in action," said Councilwoman Stacy Rye, an ordinance sponsor. "This is it for us. This is our lifetimes."
After a nearly seven hour meeting, the ordinance, which protects Missoula residents from housing and employment discrimination based on "actual or perceived ... sexual orientation, gender identity or expression" passed by a vote of 10-2.
"Hopefully our actions tonight will ripple through Montana from Libby to Billings, from Dillon to Wolf Point, and eventually to the capital in Helena," said Councilman Dave Strohmaier, another sponsor of the ordinance.
Apparently, oddly enough, anti-discrimination ordinances are a contentious issue in Missoula. Mayor John Engen even warned people in attendance that he would recess the meeting if the audience clapped for anyone--for or against the proposal. But when the final vote was taken, the pent-up applause erupted and many supporters offered the council a standing ovation.
And they deserved They've set the standard for the rest of Montana, and for another other town which doesn't protect it's citizens from discrimination.
First steps.
"Most of us can't remember civil rights in action," said Councilwoman Stacy Rye, an ordinance sponsor. "This is it for us. This is our lifetimes."
After a nearly seven hour meeting, the ordinance, which protects Missoula residents from housing and employment discrimination based on "actual or perceived ... sexual orientation, gender identity or expression" passed by a vote of 10-2.
"Hopefully our actions tonight will ripple through Montana from Libby to Billings, from Dillon to Wolf Point, and eventually to the capital in Helena," said Councilman Dave Strohmaier, another sponsor of the ordinance.
Apparently, oddly enough, anti-discrimination ordinances are a contentious issue in Missoula. Mayor John Engen even warned people in attendance that he would recess the meeting if the audience clapped for anyone--for or against the proposal. But when the final vote was taken, the pent-up applause erupted and many supporters offered the council a standing ovation.
And they deserved They've set the standard for the rest of Montana, and for another other town which doesn't protect it's citizens from discrimination.
Good job, Missoula!
Wednesday, March 03, 2010
Virginia Is For Asshats

Yesterday, up in the Virginia statehouse, a delegate subcommittee, killed legislation aimed at banning job discrimination against gay state employees. See, those asshats that the asshats of Virginia elected to represent their asshat state in its asshattedness, want to discriminate against gay people; they want it.
The nondiscrimination bill, sponsored, of course, by a Democratic senator, Donald McEachin, was proposed after new asshat Republican governor Bob McDonnell issued an executive order than banned job discrimination based on a variety of characteristics.
Except sexual orientation.
McDonnell believes you can't discriminate against people for their race, gender, age, religion, shoe size, IQ, lack of fashion sense, height, weight, hair color, but you can discriminate against people because of who they love. McDonnell said that was a matter for the legislature, even though the two previous administrations had protected gays against bias in state employment.
So, he changed the rules, because he's a Republican, a wingnut, a conservative and an asshat.
And while the senate had passed the all-inclusive non-discrimination bill, the house subcommittee rejected it in an unrecorded show-of-hands vote.
Unrecorded. That way they can keep their hate for the gay community hidden. It's like wearing a white hood; they hate, but you can't see their faces.
Virginia? Eff off.
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Lutherans Move Forward

What's this? A gay-friendly, non-discriminatory church that isn't Episcopalian? 'Tis true, my friends, 'tis true.
Now, don't expect it to be all flowers and kisses at the debate. no, it'll most likely be reminiscent of, oh I don't know, say a Town Hall meeting on health care. All shouting and shoving. See, they won't be deliberating on whether gays and lesbians can be ordained--they already can be, as long as they remain celibate. Now the talks will be whether or not the ordained gay men and lesbians can be in committed relationships as well and still be allowed to preach. Partnered gay clergy are technically prohibited, though some congregations break the rule without punishment.
The nation's largest Lutheran denomination is considering lifting its ban on gay and lesbian members of the clergy who are in lifelong, monogamous relationships. At its convention, more than than 1,000 delegates will debate church policy at the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America's (ELCA) biennial General Assembly in Minneapolis.
Now, don't expect it to be all flowers and kisses at the debate. no, it'll most likely be reminiscent of, oh I don't know, say a Town Hall meeting on health care. All shouting and shoving. See, they won't be deliberating on whether gays and lesbians can be ordained--they already can be, as long as they remain celibate. Now the talks will be whether or not the ordained gay men and lesbians can be in committed relationships as well and still be allowed to preach. Partnered gay clergy are technically prohibited, though some congregations break the rule without punishment.
Like most mainline Protestant churches, the Lutheran church has been deeply divided over homosexuality and how to interpret what the Bible says about it. The church even formed a task force to study the matter in depth, and make policy recommendations that would be put to a churchwide vote.
This month, those proposals will come before the voting members in Minneapolis for their consideration. Among the proposals are a 30-page social statement that defines the church's position on sexuality...I'll refrain from a top or bottom joke...and a four-step plan to lift the ban on partnered gay ministers.
The four step plan is:
- The ECLA is committed to allowing congregations and synods to recognize and support "lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationships."
- The ELCA is committed to finding a way for people in such relationships to serve as clergy in the church.
- The ELCA agrees to respect the consciences of churchmembers who disagree on the issue.
- The ELCA agrees to remove the blanket ban on partnered gay clergy.
If adopted by the assembly, the plan would remove the ban on non-celibate gay and lesbian clergy and empower local congregations and governing bodies to make their own decisions on whether to allow them. The plan requires a simple majority vote to pass.
To ease concerns, the resolutions stipulate that congregations do not have to hire ministers in same-sex unions and congregations would be allowed to keep their openly gay pastor without fear of repercussions.
It's nice to see yet another church realize that God does not discriminate. Man does. And if the church wants to spread the word of God, they should be open and willing to talk to anyone, and have anyone talk to them.
Wednesday, May 06, 2009
Another Step
Procter & Gamble, the world's largest consumer products maker, has amended its anti-discrimination policy to include gender identity and expression. The policy was recently amended to read:
"We at P&G recognize the power that comes from people of diverse backgrounds and experiences coming together around a common goal. Our policy forbids any discrimination, harassment or intimidation because of race, color, religion, gender, age, national origin, citizenship, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, disability or other non-job-related personal characteristic. Employees are encouraged to bring questions or concerns in this area to their management. Strict disciplinary action for violations of this policy will be taken, including termination of employment."
Procter & Gamble, which makes such brands as Bounty, Crest and Pampers, earned an 85 in the Human Rights Campaign's 2008 Buyer's Guide, which assigns scores to companies based on their support for the LGBT community.
Good for you, Procter & Gamble. Set the standard for non-discrimination.
Are you listening WalMart?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











