![]() |
We’re a couple of weeks out from Election Day and many of us are still angry and sad and frustrated from the election of The Felon. Like many Americans, I am left wondering what people were thinking by putting this liar, convicted felon, and sexual assaulter in the Oval Office again. What’s going to happen to us, and to the most vulnerable, marginalized among us? And when are the MAGAts going to realize what they’ve done by voting for a criminal? I imagine it will be January 20, 2025, but then it’ll be too late; no do-overs. Still, there is some light in the darkness; we have many victories to celebrate … After it was clear The Felon would win the election, he and his supporters declared that he had won an “unprecedented and powerful mandate” but did he? The final Electoral College victory was 312-226. Sounds impressive, I guess, if this were a sportsball game, but by historical standards, it’s actually a very close margin. In fact, The Felon did only slightly better Biden’s 306-232 victory in 2020, which was a hair better than The Felon’s 304-227 win in 2016. To contrast: Reagan won with 489 Electoral Votes in 1980 and with 525; George H W Bush got 426 Electoral Votes in 1988; Clinton, 370 in 1992 or 379 in 1996; Obama won 365 Electoral Votes in 2008 and 332 in 2012. Nothing “unprecedented” about The Felon’s victory. But what about the popular vote? Sure, The Felon broke Republicans’ long losing streak by actually winning the popular vote for the first time in 20 years but his margin is nothing to brag about. According to CNN, The Felon leads Harris by 3.2 million votes, or 50.2% to 48.1% with 95% of the votes counted but with millions of votes left to count, including in very blue parts of California, that margin will close and it appears The Felon could end up with under 50% of the vote, with a winning margin of under 1.5%.Compare this with four years ago, when Joe Biden won by 7 million votes and 4.4% of the vote. Sure, The Felon won, but the margin of victory was no mandate. And while The Felon won the Big Prize, November 5th was an outright loss for other MAGA candidates. Look at Mark Robinson in North Carolina and Kari Lake in Arizona; both lost decisively. In North Carolina, Robinson lost to Democratic Attorney General Josh Stein by almost 15% and North Carolina voters chose a new Democratic Lt. Governor, Rachel Hunt, a new Democratic Attorney General, Jeff Jackson, and Democrats even flipped a state House seat to break the GOP’s legislative supermajority, which means Governor Josh Stein will be able to veto the worst of what Republicans try to unilaterally shove down North Carolinians’ throats. In Arizona, Democratic Representative Ruben Gallego defeated MAGA election denier Kari Lake for the state’s open U.S. Senate seat by 2.5%. That makes Gallego the first Latino U.S. Senator from Arizona and marks the fourth Democratic U.S. Senate win in the state in a row. That means that Arizona, whose voter rolls boast 300,000 more Republicans than Democrats, has Democrats serving as both U.S. Senators, Governor, Attorney General, and Secretary of State. We’re not dead yet, y’all. In addition to Gallego, Democrats did very well in swing state U.S. Senate races, including several Democratic female candidates,: Senator Jacky Rosen in Nevada, Senator Tammy Baldwin in Wisconsin and Senator-elect Elissa Slotkin in Michigan. Now, with the loss of Senator Bob Casey in Pennsylvania, Democrats will be the Senate minority but imagine how much worse it would have been without those other wins. The strong Democratic performance in North Carolina is going to be crucial in 2026 when Senator Thom Tillis is up for reelection and in 2028 when Sen. Ted Budd is up. Flipping those seats is the path back for Democrats to a Senate majority by 2028. And with North Carolina’s new state Representative-elect Dante Pittman, whose flip of a red seat kept the GOP from wielding an ongoing legislative supermajority, to Michigan where Democrats expanded their majority on the state Supreme Court, to Pennsylvania where Democrats held onto their state House majority, the work on the ground in swing states proved decisive in race after race. That’s where we start to win and move that up the ticket. And also look at the wins on progressive policies: out of the ten states that had abortion rights protection measures on the ballot, those initiatives passed in six of them, including in red states like Montana and Missouri where, thanks to these results, there will now be legal pathways to challenge the current restrictive GOP abortion bans. Abortion protection measures also passed in swing states Arizona and Nevada, as well as blue states such as New York, Maryland, and Colorado, where there will now be additional firewalls against future Republican attempts to restrict women’s freedom. And what about worker’s rights? In deep-red Alaska, Ballot Measure 1, which raises the state’s minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2027 and provides employees the ability to accrue paid sick leave, passed with around 57% of the vote. A similar measure in conservative Missouri, which would raise the minimum wage to $15 by 2026 and allow employees to earn an hour of paid sick time for every 30 hours worked, passed with 58% of the vote. And in Nebraska voters passed their own paid sick leave measure, winning nearly 75% of the vote. All this points to a clear opportunity for Democrats moving forward by championing progressive economic policy so that working-class voters understand who is truly fighting for them at all levels of government. And since The Felon will once again enter the presidency with majorities in both houses of Congress, it’s more important than ever for Democratic leaders around the country to align against his worst policy instincts and do what they can to minimize the damage. In the last week, we’ve seen Democratic Governors come out strongly asserting their intention to block attempts to undermine the rule of law and their citizens’ rights in their states. Such as Governor Pritzker of Illinois, who said: “To anyone who intends to take away the freedom, opportunity and dignity of Illinoisans, I would remind you that a happy warrior is still a warrior. You come for my people, you come through me.” And Governor Newsom of California who convened special Legislative sessions of Congress to take on The Felon’s attacks on education, women and the LGBTQ+ community. And let’s also remember the history-making Democrats voters chose to elevate last week, like Sarah McBride from Delaware, who will become our first openly transgender member of Congress; Senators-Elect Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland and Lisa Blunt Rochester of Delaware, making history; the first ever Korean American U.S. Senator, Andy Kim of New Jersey; Julie Johnson, the first openly LGBTQ+ member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Texas. At the local level, Democrat Monroe Nichols is the first Black Mayor of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a city where Black businesses were once burned to the ground and its residents terrorized and killed by white mobs. And now young LGBTQ+ leaders of color: Rashaun Kemp in Georgia and Amaad Rivera-Wagner in Wisconsin. So, yeah, we are all still heartbroken and shell-shocked but let’s not forget the wins, especially those in Red states, and those progressive policy wins, and those down ballot victories. That’s where you can find the hope as we move through the next two-to-four years. We, as a party, are in a good position to make gains in the next two years as The Felon inevitably overreaches with unpopular initiatives and dubious Cabinet picks, and his so-called “mandate.” Don’t sit this one out because that’s what the Right wants us to do. h/t The Big Picture |
Showing posts with label Progress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Progress. Show all posts
Monday, November 18, 2024
Good News and Hope from November 5th
Thursday, September 05, 2024
Bobservations
![]() |
Here’s proof that just because you’re a relatively slender
model, it doesn’t mean you can have the most delightful cakes. |
![]() |
This is Stefano Tomadini—sounds like a Delicious pasta dish—an Italian model. But this isn’t about food or models, it’s about a simple question: Would You Hit It? |
Labels:
Bad Fashion,
Bob,
Bobservations,
Butts,
Cakes,
Camden,
Carlos,
Christian Nationalism,
Fashion,
Funny,
Hot Men,
Melanie,
Plagiarism,
Progress,
Ryan Walters,
Stefano Tomadini,
Tuxedo,
Weird,
Would You Hit It,
X
Wednesday, May 04, 2016
South Carolina Is Progressive. That's Right, I Said It!
WCNC
Monday, September 10, 2012
I'm A Tree Hugger ... Sue Me
One thing I love about living in Smallville are all the
trees. We must have over two hundred different trees on our property here, with
every kind of tree from a Dogwood to a Pine, from Oaks to Crepe Myrtle and
Magnolia. So, I'm a tree lover and a tree hugger, which is why this story bothers
me.
After being flown into Los
Angeles International Airport, the space shuttle, Endeavor, will find its permanent
home at the
California Science Center. And there's going to be a big to-do to celebrate Endeavor’s
arrival, including a parade.
Nice, huh?
Except, in order for the shuttle to make its way through
city streets on its way to the museum, several obstacles must be removed,
including four-hundred trees.
Not, removed, and then replanted after the parade, but
chopped down. And residents along the parade route aren't feeling happy about
it. Many of the trees are large, decades old, magnolias, firs and pines,
and even though the California Science Center has promised to replant twice as
many trees along the route, that is little comfort to residents.
See, they aren't transplanting full-grown trees to replace
the ones removed; they're planting saplings that will take many years to grow
into what will be cut down in a day for a parade.
Now, there were other options to avoid removing these grand
trees, one of which would be dismantling the shuttle and rebuilding it on site.
But some say that taking it apart to move it would permanently damage
parts of the shuttle, and airlifting something that heavy from LAX to the
museum is nearly impossible. In addition, the shuttle wouldn't fit under
overpasses on freeways, so surfaces will have to do.
And the trees will have to go. Inglewood will lose 128
trees, and communities in South Los Angeles about 265 trees, though the exact
number has not yet been determined. One route, originally set for the
"parade" was scrapped because it would have meant the removal of
trees that were planted in honor of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.
When are we going to learn that we can't continue to rape
the planet and hope that she'll get better? This isn't progress, this is
ridiculous. I personally don't see what's wrong with taking the shuttle apart
and then reassembling it. It’s not like one day, in the distant future, we're
going to send Endeavor back into space.
Why not save some trees. They're the only things being
harmed by this.
via Treehugger
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Two Faiths .... Two Views
One of the
problems I think we have as a country is that we tend to lump all people into
categories. I mean, all gay men aren’t sex pigs; all
Black men aren’t deadbeat dads, all Mexicans aren’t illegal, and all religions
aren’t the same. And that’s what
we have here: a tale of two faiths.
It seems that,
last week, the General Assembly of the nation's largest Presbyterian
denomination voted against a proposal that would have paved the way toward the
church allowing same-sex weddings in their midst.
The proposal would
have changed the church's Book of Order to define marriage as between "two
people" but after the vote—and the narrow victory—it will keep the
definition of marriage as between "a man and a woman."
"God, we are
a divided church," said the Reverend Neal Presa, a New Jersey pastor and
the General Assembly moderator, said while guiding church members in prayer
after the vote.
And, in light of
thatvote by the General Assembly—which is made up of pastors and lay people—pro-same
sex marriage activists must wait another two years until the church's next
national meeting to make marriage-related proposals.
On the other hand,
On the other hand, the
United Methodist Church in the Northwest has set itself at with its parent
denomination by endorsing Referendum 74 and asking voters to make Washington
the nation’s seventh state to enact same-sex marriage.
The
issue of marriage equality has divided much of Washington's faith
community. While Episcopalians, Methodists and the ecumenical Faith Action
Network have come out for same-sex marriage, the state’s Catholic bishops and
many fundamentalist churches opposed it. Seattle Archbishop J. Peter
Sartain, apparently unaware of that whole Separation of Church and State thingy,
even asked his parishes to serve as collection centers for signatures on the
referendum petition. Still, many Seattle and Tacoma parishes refused the Archbishop’s request and
even sent contingents from Catholics for Marriage Equality and Mormons for
Marriage Equality to march in the Seattle Pride Day parade.
And
while the United Methodist Church in the Northwest has come down on the side of
equality, all is not the same among all Methodists. The parent church, at
its convention, rejected a change in church doctrine, which asserts
that “the practice of homosexuality is incompatible with Christian
teaching.” Gays and lesbians are officially not allowed to serve as
clergy, and the celebration of holy unions is prohibited by church law.
But the
Reverend Sandy Brown, at Seattle First United Methodist Church, will not be silent: “Our
church will not be deterred by our denomination’s heartless stand on
homosexuality. We are out and proud to stand with our LGBT
families, friends and neighbors.”
So,
while all gays are not alike, or all Black men, Mexicans, women, and people of
faith, the simple fact remains that in this country all men are supposed to be created equal. And some
churches, some people of faith, as well aware of that, and are doing something
about it.
Friday, June 29, 2012
Good News Friday: A New Bill To Extend Equality To All Military Families
What's this?
A
bill, the Military Spouses Equal Treatment Act of 2012 [MSET], has been introduced
in Congress and it would change the definition of "spouse" in
four areas of U.S. Code
related to recognition, support, and benefits for married service members and
veterans. These changes would ensure that spouses of the same gender are
eligible for key military benefits.
Equality say
what?
Aubrey
Sarvis, executive director of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network [SLDN]
says: "Our nation's senior military leaders
and commanders on the ground are increasingly uncomfortable with administering
two classes of recognition, support and benefits for our nation's service
members - one for straight service members and a different one for their gay
and lesbian peers. There cannot be two classes of service members, and this
legislation addresses that effectively."
And, in
addition, the Department of Defense General
Counsel Jeh Johnson also mentioned the disparity between same-sex and
opposite-sex couples: "The repeal of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' exposes
certain inequalities between similarly situated couples in the military
community. This troubles many of our leaders."
The
bill was introduced by House Armed Services Committee Ranking Member, and
Democrat...naturally...Adam Smith of Washington. His bill adds a favorable
definition of "spouse" to Title 37 to provide greater uniformity of
benefits for same-sex spouses. Together with MSET, this new bill would extend
dozens of important spousal benefits and support programs to same-gender
spouses, including coverage under TriCare insurance, an increased housing
allowance, and survivor benefits.
As
it should be, if all things were equal. So let's hope this bill passes, because
a step for same-sex married couples anywhere is progress for same-sex couples
everywhere.via SLDN
Tuesday, June 05, 2012
♪♫ The Times, They Are a-Changing ♫♪
I still remember those old ads on TV and magazines from back in the day.
White people in pretty houses, doing white people things; like eating and cooking and cleaning and driving and shopping.
And even as a young gayling I knew that wasn't quite right.
Then I saw an ad with a Black people doing Black people things; like eating and cooking and cleaning and driving and shopping.
And as a slightly older queerling, I knew that wasn't quite right.
But now, we're getting very close to quite right, with ads featuring gay people doing gay people things; like eating and cooking and cleaning and driving and shopping.
Kenneth Cole
Absolut
American Airlines
Avis
Chevrolet
IKEA
JCPenney
RayBan
Orbitz
Tylenol PM
White people in pretty houses, doing white people things; like eating and cooking and cleaning and driving and shopping.
And even as a young gayling I knew that wasn't quite right.
Then I saw an ad with a Black people doing Black people things; like eating and cooking and cleaning and driving and shopping.
And as a slightly older queerling, I knew that wasn't quite right.
But now, we're getting very close to quite right, with ads featuring gay people doing gay people things; like eating and cooking and cleaning and driving and shopping.
Kenneth Cole
Labels:
Advertising,
Good News,
LGBTQ+,
LGBTQ+ Rights,
Progress
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)