A Catholic curia—a group of Vatican bureaucrats who assist
the Pope in the exercise of his primatial jurisdiction over the Roman Catholic
church—in Poland has asked for a court to determine whether or not the rape victim
of a Catholic priest took “pleasure in the intimate relationship.”
The victim, Janusz Szymik, was 12 years old when the abuse
began and the Catholic Church wants to know if he enjoyed being sexually
assaulted by a priest.
Last year, Szymik
launched a civil case against Bielsko-Żywiec diocese seeking roughly $1
million in compensation from the curia, which he argues is responsible for
abuse he suffered at the hands of a priest—named only as Jan W. under Polish
privacy law—in the 1980s.
A church court had previously found Jan W. guilty of sexual
offences against Szymik, and in 2017, Jan W. was given a five-year ban on
conducting priestly ministry, hearing confession, and was ordered to live in
isolation.
Cut to today, and the curia, really the Catholic Church, is demanding
“evidence from an expert sexologist on
the determination of the claimant’s sexual preferences, in particular
determination of the claimant’s sexual orientation.”
And they would like to question Szymik on his relationship
with the priest, including him “showing pleasure in maintaining an intimate
relationship with Jan W.” and even “deriving benefits [from it], including
material benefits.”
Victim blaming is a Catholic thing, unless the victim is
Catholic …
The curia also argues that, although Szymik was an altar
boy, because meetings between him and Jan W,--the adult—took place
outside the church they were not related to Jan W.’s ministry.
Note to child raping Catholic priests: do it outside of the
church and you’re safe.
The curia claims Szymik “participated voluntarily” in his
rape because “the sexual contacts did not take place during the performance of
the duties entrusted to him.”
Again, pedophiles, take your business outside and the church
will protect you.
In response to the publication of the diocese’s legal
submission, Tomasz Terlikowski, a prominent Catholic commentator, called the questions
the curia proposes asking of Szymik are indicative of a “pedophile’s model of
thinking” and will cause “the victim harm again.”
Again, keep in mind that Szymik is still suffering the
effects of being raped by a priest when he was twelve years old, and that the Catholic
Church thinks because he may have enjoyed it, or because it didn’t happen on
church property, that it really didn’t happen at all, or just doesn’t matter.
Also keep in mind that child rapist Jan W. is suspected of
raping other boys while a priest, and rather than being punished of jailed for
his crimes, he is quietly living a life of seclusion on the Catholic Church’s
dime because they care more about their image, and their bank accounts, than
they do the victims of child sexual abuse.
Notes
from Poland |