Oh, I just love when Republicans step in it and then try to
scrape off their shoes and pretend they said nothing.
Last week during a call with members of the media, Indiana’s
GOP Senator, Mike Braun said the U.S. Supreme Court was wrong to legalize
interracial marriage decades ago, and that the decision should have been left
to individual states.
No sooner than you could shout racism, or at least no sooner
than a more intelligent person on Braun’s staff could get to him, five hours
later, Braun released a statement saying he misunderstood "a line of
questioning," and emphasized that he condemns racism "in any
form."
It all happened during a press call when Braun said he
believes abortion rights questions should have been left up to the states back
when Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973.
A reporter then asked if he applied the same reasoning to
the Supreme Court's decision in 1967 that struck down state laws banning
interracial marriage under the 14th amendment, which guarantees all citizens
equal protection under the law, and Braun said:
"When it comes to issues, you can't have it both ways. When
you want that diversity to shine within our federal system, there are going to
be rules and proceedings, they're going to be out of sync with maybe what other
states would do. It's the beauty of the system, and that's where the
differences among points of view in our 50 states ought to express
themselves."
Not realizing what a racist tool he was sounding like, Mike Braun
doubled down when asked if he would be agree with leaving the decision of
whether to allow interracial marriage up to states:
"Yes, I think that that's something that if you're not
wanting the Supreme Court to weigh in on issues like that, you're not going to
be able to have your cake and eat it too. I think that's hypocritical."
And then hours later, after I’m sure his staff told him what
a white sheet wearing asshat he sounded like, Braun backtracked:
“Earlier during a virtual press conference I misunderstood a
line of questioning that ended up being about interracial marriage. Let me be
clear on that issue — there is no question the Constitution prohibits
discrimination of any kind based on race, that is not something that is even up
for debate, and I condemn racism in any form, at all levels and by any states,
entities, or individuals.”
I don’t know, Mike, when you answered the question on
interracial marriage you seemed very clear it should be a state’s rights issue,
and then suddenly you did a one-eighty.
Not quite buying it, but it does get the idea out there that,
maybe, if votes go a certain way, those so-called conservatives can put a stop
to that “mixing of the races” business.
And it’s not just interracial marriage … during the second
day of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing last
week, Texas’ GOP Senator John Cornyn attacked marriage equality. His objection is
that granting equal rights to LGBTQ people … let that sink in, granting equality
… conflicts with the religious beliefs of some people, to which Jackson
responded:
“Well, senator, that is the nature of a right. That when there
is a right, it means that there are limitations on regulation, even if people
are regulating pursuant to their sincerely held religious beliefs.”
|
I wish the GOP would just implode from its own stupidity. But I'm not holding my breath.
ReplyDeleteOld Republicans don't die, they just go crazy.
ReplyDeleteReally am surprised to see
ReplyDeletethis lunacy in this day and age!!
xoxo :-)
Racists, Bigots and Faux-Christians trying to force their abhorrent views upon all of Society isn't something the rest of us should become complacent about ever.
ReplyDeleteAsshats.
ReplyDeleteAre English people allowed to comment on American democracy since you whupped our asses in 1776? If we are allowed to comment may I put a plea out to your American readers? PLEASE VOTE DEMOCRAT IN THE MID-TERMS!
ReplyDeleteThe GOP platform is racism, sexism, homophobia and xenophobia. That's it. In plain sight.
ReplyDeleteAnd many say the silent part aloud.
They need to be voted into oblivion.
XOXO
Yes, I’ll take them both at those words that spilled out of their mouths before anyone could help them lie.
ReplyDeleteI just cannot understand the mindset of those who object to other people’s choices. Whatever your skin colour, race, disability, religion, sexual orientation our bodies are all the same under the skin. There may be people with deformed skeletons, but we all have skeletons. What some people appear to have missing is a brain add in guns and you have a highly volatile mix that boils over almost every day
ReplyDeleteI am confounded by Cornyn's suggestion that my life must be governed by someone else's religious beliefs, when the Constitution specifically says government shall impose no religion on its citizens.
ReplyDelete“Well, senator, that is the nature of a right. That when there is a right, it means that there are limitations on regulation, even if people are regulating pursuant to their sincerely held religious beliefs.” - I LOVE THIS WOMAN. That is one clever, clever response. I keep reading it and getting goose bumps.
ReplyDeleteI do not understand why anybody would have an objection to someone enjoying a right you, yourself, enjoy. What is that about? That there's not enough to go around? Or is it really about wanting to be superior to others? To create a class of 'others?'
I really wish we'd get back to the whole separation of church and state thing. Bring me a candidate who runs with that as the basis of his campaign and I am all ears.
As part of what the Faux-Christian right would call an infidel, I know that if they had their way, we'd all be rounded up and sent to a detention camp! Or worse
ReplyDeleteREMEMBER TO VOTE!