Showing posts with label Jerrold Nadler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jerrold Nadler. Show all posts
Friday, March 29, 2019
Friday, June 02, 2017
I Didn't Say It ...
![]() |
Jerrold Nadler, Democratic Senator from New York, saying _____’s firing of Comey could be “it”:
“If the president fired Comey because he asked for loyalty and hadn’t gotten it, because he had asked him to ease off on the investigation of [Michael] Flynn—because in effect he was asking him to ease off the investigation of possible collusion by the Trump campaign with the Russians in subverting the election—that would be obstruction of justice which is an impeachable offense.”
And rumor has it that Comey has the goods, so ... fingers crossed!
[photo]
|
![]() |
Leon Panetta, former CIA Director and Defense Secretary, on _____:
"Presidents are human beings, and they react emotionally to issues that bother them [but] you are the President of the United States. And your first responsibility is to be President. It’s not to react emotionally to issues that pop up every day. I don’t see anybody who’s got political experience, who has experience running a White House. I sense that there’s a lot of competing centers of power within the White House and it’s creating a chaotic background to try to support the President of the United States. And if that continues, I think this presidency is going to be chaotic into the future.”
Too many chiefs and not enough Indians, and a whole lotta asshats with ties to Russia.
[photo]
|
![]() |
Kellyanne Conway, trying to shift focus away from Jared:
“This entire thing is just a rush to judgment. We have been talking about this for about 8 months and yet…it’s a lot easier to scream Russia, Russia, Russia every day.”
Um, Kellyanne, you ignorant slut, it’s because every f**king day we learn more and more people on your team have ties to Russia.
I’m begging to think your real name is Svetlana Conway.
[photo]
|
![]() |
John Boehner, former House Speaker on _____:
"I was a little more optimistic about it early in the year; now my odds are 60/40. The border adjustment tax is deader than a doornail. Tax reform is just a bunch of happy talk. Everything else he’s done has been a complete disaster. He’s still learning how to be president.”
And do we really want someone who’s learning how to do the job and then, every single day, proving he’s incapable of doing it?
That was a rhetorical question.
[photo]
|
![]() |
Devin Nunes, blaming Russia investigation on Democrat sour grapes over Hillary Clinton’s loss:
“The Democrats don’t want an investigation on Russia. They want an independent commission. Why do they want an independent commission? Because they want to continue the narrative that Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump are best friends, and that’s the reason that he won, because Hillary Clinton would have never lost on her own; it had to be someone else’s fault.”
Um, the Democrats want an independent commission because the GOP cannot be trusted to do anything other than support their party while the country burns,
The Democrats want an independent commission because people like Devin Nunes scurry like rats to the White House to warn _____ of the impending investigation.
Devin, you dickwad? Serve your country, not your party.
Or go home.
[photo]
|
![]() |
Sean Spicer, White House Press Secretary and Punching Bag, trying to salvage _____’s Tweet about “covfefe”:
“The president and a small group of people know exactly what he meant.”
Um, yeah, it means the president cannot spell, cannot form a coherent sentence and spends too much time on Twitter.
Seriously, he’s an illiterate teenager.
[photo]
|
Friday, October 26, 2012
I Didn't Say It ....
President Obama,
on Mittsy's shift from being a "severe conservative" to
moderate:
"We've got to name this
condition that he's going through. I think it's called Romnesia. That's what
it's called. I think that's what he's going through. Now, I'm not a medical
doctor, but I do want to go over the symptoms with you—because I want to make sure
nobody else catches it....You know if you say if you're for equal pay, but you
can't say if you'll sign a bill for equal pay, you might have Romnesia....If
you say you think women should have access to contraceptive care, but you
support legislation that would let employers deny contraceptive care, you
might have Romnesia.....If you say you you'll protect a woman's right to
choose, but you stand up in a primary debate and say you'd be delighted to ban
abortion in all cases, then you definitely have Romnesia. This extends to other
issues...If you have Romnesia, here's the good news—Obamacare covers
preexisting conditions. We can fix you! We can make you well."
What else is there to say?
When he’s right … he’s right.
"Speaker Boehner has wasted more than a
year, and more than $1.5 million taxpayer dollars defending DOMA. So far,
he has lost five cases in a row as every court has ruled that there is no
legitimate justification for this law. Every day, DOMA harms thousands of
American couples and their children. Instead of wasting taxpayer money
defending this unjust law in court, Speaker Boehner should join us in our
effort to repeal it."
If you remember, Boehner said
this whole mess would cost a million-and-a-half and he’s just about reached his
limit.
Show of hands … who thinks
Boehner will stop his anti-marriage equality goosestep now?
Seimone Augustus, a guard for
the Minnesota Lynx in the WNBA, on marriage equality and proposing to
her girlfriend:
"I felt like it was the
perfect time for me, being on a platform where I can make a change with my
voice and my situation. Maybe inspire someone else to come out and be
comfortable with themselves. Or maybe someone else's parents will see my
parents saying that it's OK to be with your child and love your child
unconditionally regardless of your sexual preference."
First things first: Seimone? it's not a poreference. preference denotes choice and we all know it's not a choice.
Secondly: good for you for coming out, and good for you for proposaomng to you girlfriend.
Every
day more and more folks come out, and every day more and more gay folks get
married.
The tide is changing, and we
need to keep that momentum going.
"While that might make for some good
post-debate spin, perhaps exploitation of his late father’s memory and dramatic
television, the conduct of Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign is a far cry
from the kind of campaign and conduct, as a public servant, I saw during the
seven years I worked in George Romney’s campaigns and served him as
governor. But it is Mitt’s behavior during this presidential campaign
that is distinguishing – and not those of his father at all. Since 2005, when
he first decided to seek the presidency, his political posture and positions
have shifted in erratic and startling ways, to the right, to the middle, to the
right and shifting still. I’ve tried to track Mitt Romney’s shifts – some 180
degrees others 360 — on key issues during the campaign. I’ve stopped at 30:
abortion, stem-cell research; climate change and global warming; campaign finance;
and equal pay for women are just a few."
The man never met a
position he didn’t embrace, regale against, and then embrace again. His father,
and mother, would be so proud of their son, who doesn’t want to be president
because he thinks he’s a good leader; he wants the job because it’s a nice
capper to his resume.
“Well, I am certainly hoping our president
stays put. If you’re a woman, you should be very, very scared of that, for many
reasons. And obviously as a gay person he doesn’t believe in me having the same
rights, so of course I’m not happy about that.”
If you’re a woman, or if you’re
gay, or if you’re middle class, Mittsy doesn’t care about you.
I mean, we all heard him say
that, right? The 47% he doesn’t worry about?
Josh Mandel, Ohio GOP Senate
candidate, opposes all LGBT equality issues, but wants The Gays to know he'll represent
us:
"On the military side, I
disagree with [DADT repeal]. As far as the decision here in state of Ohio, I’m
a supporter of marriage between one man and one woman. I believe in traditional
marriage. At the same time, I want you to know I will do everything I can to
represent every single person in the state of Ohio — all 11 and a half million
people. Regardless of their background, regardless of their socioeconomic
background, regardless of their race, their religion or any other
characteristic…I’m going to be blind to race, religion, any other type of
orientation here in the state of Ohio and when I go to Washington."
He doesn’t want The Gays in the military, and he doesn’t
want The Gays to get married, but he’s gonna fight for The Gays.
Only a Republican could say that with a straight--pun intended because Joshy has a bad case of Gay Face--face ….
Richard Mourdock, Indiana
Senate candidate who has been endorsed by Mitt Romney, on pregnancy as a result
of rape:
"I've just struggled with it myself for a long time,
but I came to realize that life is that gift from god. And even when life
begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God
intended to happen."
And then he backtracked:
"God creates life,
and that was my point. God does not want rape, and by no means was I suggesting
that he does. Rape is a horrible thing, and for anyone to twist my words
otherwise is absurd and sick."
Um, Dick? May I call you Dick
because you are a dick? Your exact words:
‘when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is
something that God intended.’
No one twisted it, you
asshat. That’s what you said.
And gain, dear readers and voters,
who would vote for such a wingnut? And who would support such a ….
Mittsy.
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Five LGBT Allies
Sometimes it's hard to tell the gay-friendly from the homophobes--yes, I'm talking switch-hitter Tim Pawlenty, for one. And then you have the blatantly homophobic, anti-gay, anti-equality Jim DeMint from the great :::cough cough::: state of South Carolina who gets physically ill at the idea of homosexuality; and then we also have Queen Of The Asshats, Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, who believes that the LGBT community is a bigger threat than terrorism.
Senator Tom Harkin, who did what a handful of Senators did this year: he publicly stated that he regretted his vote on the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996. Harkin joined Senators Arlen Specter and Chris Dodd in denouncing their vote for DOMA. But Harkin had a sense of eloquence in his comments, and it didn't hurt that they came right on the heels of Iowa's Supreme Court ruling that the state’s constitution required the recognition of same-sex marriage.
Number Four:
Congressman Earl Blumenauer, of Oregon, who also blasted the Defense of Marriage Act. Blumenauer also issued a statement regretting his original vote for DOMA, going so far as to say he not only regretted the vote, but felt it was the worst vote he ever cast in his entire political career. Blumenauer vowed to lobby his fellow legislators in efforts to overturn DOMA.
Number Three:
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand who has, well, for lack of a better term, come out strongly as one of the Senate’s biggest supporters for equal rights. Hers is one of the loudest voices in the Senate for ending Don't Ask, Don't Tell and has called the battle for marriage equality the civil rights battle of today’s generation. Gillibrand even tried to exert some pull with the New York State Senate in their [failed] marriage equality vote, and supports a fully inclusive version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.
Number Two:
Congressman Patrick Murphy is the first Iraq war veteran to serve in Congress and is one of the loudest and strongest voices on ending DADT. He seems to be making it one of his goals, even touring with the Human Rights Campaign’s “Voices of Honor” tour, calling attention to how eliminating gays and lesbians from the U.S. Armed Forces not only smacks in the face of equality and freedom--the very principles that our military stands for--but also threatens our national security.
Number One...and we have a tie:
Congressman Joe Sestak of Pennsylvania has emerged as a fighter for LGBT equality. He says that one of the fights that keeps him going in politics is the battle to end the only form of institutionalized discrimination still legal in the U.S.--that of discrimination against LGBT people
Still, we do have Tammy Baldwin, Barney Frank and Jared Polis taking up our issues in Congress, but, um, they kind of have to, being gay themselves. So, who else is there? Are there are any gay-friendly heteros in office willing to stand up for us and against the likes of Bachmann and DeMint?
We do....and here are five of them that deserve our thanks, our time, and our support:
Number Five:
Senator Tom Harkin, who did what a handful of Senators did this year: he publicly stated that he regretted his vote on the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996. Harkin joined Senators Arlen Specter and Chris Dodd in denouncing their vote for DOMA. But Harkin had a sense of eloquence in his comments, and it didn't hurt that they came right on the heels of Iowa's Supreme Court ruling that the state’s constitution required the recognition of same-sex marriage.
Tom Harkin: “We all grow as we get older, and we learn things and we become more sensitive to people and people’s lives. And the more I’ve looked at that, I’ve grown to think differently about how people — how we should live. And I guess I’m at the point that, you know — I’m to that point of live and let live.”
Number Four:
Congressman Earl Blumenauer, of Oregon, who also blasted the Defense of Marriage Act. Blumenauer also issued a statement regretting his original vote for DOMA, going so far as to say he not only regretted the vote, but felt it was the worst vote he ever cast in his entire political career. Blumenauer vowed to lobby his fellow legislators in efforts to overturn DOMA.
Earl Blumenauer: “I will work to make sure that my colleagues who once, for whatever reason, joined me in supporting [DOMA] take this opportunity to correct their record and eliminate an injustice.”
Number Three:
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand who has, well, for lack of a better term, come out strongly as one of the Senate’s biggest supporters for equal rights. Hers is one of the loudest voices in the Senate for ending Don't Ask, Don't Tell and has called the battle for marriage equality the civil rights battle of today’s generation. Gillibrand even tried to exert some pull with the New York State Senate in their [failed] marriage equality vote, and supports a fully inclusive version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Number Two:
Congressman Patrick Murphy is the first Iraq war veteran to serve in Congress and is one of the loudest and strongest voices on ending DADT. He seems to be making it one of his goals, even touring with the Human Rights Campaign’s “Voices of Honor” tour, calling attention to how eliminating gays and lesbians from the U.S. Armed Forces not only smacks in the face of equality and freedom--the very principles that our military stands for--but also threatens our national security.
Patrick Murphy: “‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ clearly isn’t working for our military, and it hinders national security and military readiness at a time when America is fighting in two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. My time in Iraq taught me that our military needs and deserves the best and the brightest who are willing to serve -- and that means all Americans, regardless of their orientation.”
Number One...and we have a tie:
Congressman Joe Sestak of Pennsylvania has emerged as a fighter for LGBT equality. He says that one of the fights that keeps him going in politics is the battle to end the only form of institutionalized discrimination still legal in the U.S.--that of discrimination against LGBT people
Joe Sestak: “How can we demand that the 65,000 of our troops who are estimated to be gay act dishonestly and conceal information from their comrades and commanders? No one who serves in defense of liberty should be forced to live a lie. I cannot imagine denying equal rights to anyone I served with. How can anyone say, we fought and served together, we depended on one another, we risked our lives for this country, but back home you shouldn’t enjoy the rights that you defended?”
Congressman Jerrold Nadler also works tirelessly to get rid of DOMA, going so far as to introduce the Respect For Marriage Act that would dismantle DOMA. Nadler’s reason for introducing the Respect for Marriage Act: he wants to send DOMA “into the history books where it belongs.”
Congressman Jerrold Nadler also works tirelessly to get rid of DOMA, going so far as to introduce the Respect For Marriage Act that would dismantle DOMA. Nadler’s reason for introducing the Respect for Marriage Act: he wants to send DOMA “into the history books where it belongs.”
So, there you have five straight allies of the LGBT community. These are just some of the politicians who deserve our time, our support, and our donations, They understand equality; they understand marriage; they understand freedom and respect.
And they deserve ours.
list from change.org
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Make A Change

This news is huge for LGBT advocates working on the issue of immigration; for anyone concerned with the issues of immigration.
The Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) was introduced in Congress by Representative Jerrold Nadler and Senator Patrick Leahy. UAFA will eliminate discrimination in U.S. immigration laws by permitting same-sex partners of U.S. citizens to obtain permanent resident status. It's kind of like how straight people who marry someone from outside the country can obtain legal resident status for their partner.
According to the Washington Blade, Congress will start hearings on the UAFA next week, in which LGBT advocates will surely see as a chance to revise U.S. immigration policy with an eye toward equality.
Equality. Such a lovely word.
So, I ask you to urge Congress to help pass the Uniting American Families Act by signing the petition here on Change.org. Let's make U.S. immigration laws a little more just for LGBT couples.
More equal.
Thursday, May 14, 2009
A Moment In History To Be Recognized
Yesterday Democratic Representatives Jerrold Nadler of New York, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, Barney Frank of Massachusetts, and Jared Polis of Colorado introduced a resolution in the House of Representatives to recognize the 40th anniversary of Stonewall.
Stonewall is our Montgomery Bus Boycott. It is the LGBT community's rallying cry that enough is enough....enough was enough. And it should continue to be our rallying cry today in the on-going, decades long struggle for equality for all Americans.
On June 28, 1969, during a climate of fear and terror against the LGBT community in New York City and nationally, the New York Police Department conducted a raid of the Stonewall Inn, a bar in New York’s Greenwich Village frequented by the LGBT community. Bruised, shocked, angry and fed up, patrons of the bar organized spontaneous demonstrations outside the bar and onto the streets of New York City. Protests continued during the next few days. This watershed moment is the symbolic genesis of the gay rights movement in the U.S.
Jerrold Nadler: “The events at Stonewall 40 years ago had a profound effect on how LGBT Americans came to see their struggle for equality. Stonewall catalyzed gay Americans--and those who support their rights--into putting gay rights on the forefront, out in the open, unafraid and unapologetic. We have come very far in the battle for LGBT rights and acceptance since Stonewall, but we still have a ways to go. Together, we will keep fighting.”
Tammy Baldwin: “Stonewall was a moment in time that sparked a movement. We honor all those who stood their ground at Stonewall as we carry on their quest for full and equal rights for all Americans.”
Barney Frank: “As we move ahead in the movement for legal equality, it is important to remember those who had the courage to fight hard when things were much tougher."
Jared Polis: "With President Obama, the Democratic Congress, and the nation at our side, we are facing an incredible, historic opportunity for change for the LGBT community. But we cannot go forward without being mindful of where we’ve been. Stonewall brought the gay rights movement to the forefront of American culture and gave rise to the vibrant and politically active LGBT community that we have today. Our job now is to pick up where they left off and to provide equal rights for all Americans.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




















