Showing posts with label The Avocate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Avocate. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

Who Knew? And Why Am I So Pissed Off About It?


By now there are only two people who don't know that Sean Hayes, aka Jack MacFarland from TV's Will & Grace, has officially come out of the closet. And those two people probably live in South Carolina; just sayin'.

Is it a surprise that Hayes is now "officially" out? Not really. He's long been "suspected" of being a Friend Of Dorothy, though he has never publicly uttered the words. And therein lies the rub.

See, for the run of W&G Hayes refused to answer that question. He played the "I don't talk about my personal life" card; he played the "I don't want to be pigeonholed" card. He played everything but the "Yes, I am" card.

“When I play a gay character I want to be as believable as possible. And when I’m playing a straight character I also want to be as believable as possible. So the less that people know about my personal life, the more believable I can be as a character.”

And that's what has people annoyed. And by people, I mean, me.

I don't care if Sean Hayes is gay. Makes not one bit of difference in my life. But then I am a longstanding out queer, and I don't need a role model who might be able to pave the way for me to be able to utter those two little words: I'm gay.

But there are, or were, lots of people, young and old, who could have used a Sean Hayes example of coming out to make them feel okay to make that first step. And, for me, that is of the utmost importance: coming out. We need people to see us; to know us. How else can we expect anyone to understand our fight for our rights if they don't actually know us?

And Sean Hayes was a part of that problem.

Now, to his credit, he wasn't seen "dating" women, and he made no mention of dating women. You didn't see him at the Emmys with a pretty little thing on his arm. All well and good. But, think; what if he had gone to the Emmys with a male date? Wouldn't that have been great? What might that have done for all those people in the closet, knowing that Sean Hayes was an out actor and it was no big deal?

As the writer of The Advocate interview points out, Hayes was using his personal Don't Ask, Don't Tell--and we all know how well that works. Still, people assumed he was gay because he played gay--though Eric McCormack, who played Will, is a heterosexual, and no one confused that. But then McCormack didn't hide his orientation, because he didn't have to, and Hayes shouldn't have either. But he says he felt pressure to stay closeted.

“This town’ll do that to you. It’ll just keep you in that box until you have no choice but to be the thing that they want you to be.”

But is it the town, or is it the actor, or performer? I know Ellen Degeneres went through the same thing, but she came out before Will & Grace was anything more than an idea. So, if she blazed the trail, why did Sean Hayes stay in hiding? Was it just to get work?

Not really, because Sean Hayes did work during and after W&G. He played Jerry Lewis in a 2003 TV film; he was in an independent film, Pieces Of April, in 2003, and in 2007 he was Jack Nicholson's assistant in The Bucket List.

Would he have gotten those roles as an out gay actor? Who's to say, though Sean Hayes doesn't think so. He again plays the pigeonhole card, talking about how the Hollywood "suits" would have viewed him had been out. But, I wonder, do the suits care about a person's orientation, or about how much money can be made off the project? And does that amount of money vary if an out gay actor is in the piece?

So, Hayes stayed in; and the press worked overtime talking of his reluctance to be open about his personal life. And Hayes grew angry about that, and probably stepped further back into the closet. Even The Advocate, preparing for W&G's final episode wrote a piece about Hayes called “Sean Hayes: The Interview He Never Gave.” It was basically a bunch of quotes he'd used in interviews throughout the years that made him look very foolish for being so coy about his orientation. And since Hayes had refused for years to be interviewed by The Advocate, that last article didn't help matters.

“Really? You’re gonna shoot the gay guy down? I never have had a problem saying who I am. I am who I am. I was never in, as they say. Never."

And there we have it! Why I'm pissed at Sean Hayes.

He was IN. He was way in the closet. See, no matter how many people think you're gay, talk to one another about whether or not you're gay, no one really knows you're gay until you say the words: I'm.Gay. And until now, Sean Hayes has never said them publicly. So why now? I mean, if his arguments for Not Telling were good enough during the run of W&G, then why come out now? Well, Sean Hayes isn't talking about that.

But, is it his responsibility to talk about being a gay man? Yes, it is. Howard Bragman, a public relations expert who specializes in advising high-profile clients who are coming out--he recently advised Meredith Baxter, though not Sean Hayes, says, “The research says if somebody knows a gay person, they’re going to be more in favor of our civil rights. And tens of millions of people know Sean and love him. This is an old friend telling us he’s gay, and it’s going to resonate.”

That's my belief, too. How many people might have different views of the LGBT community if more of us, both public figures, celebrities, and private citizens, spoke up? You cannot be afraid of something that's out in the open. It's the fear of what homosexuality might be, that feeds this hatred of our community, and the more of us that come out, the less afraid people will be of us.

"I believe that nobody owes anything to anybody. Nobody owes anything to anybody. You are your authentic self to whom and when you choose to be, and if you don’t know somebody, then why would you explain to them how you live your life?”

Why, Sean? Because they might see you as an ally; they might feel less afraid of being their authentic self if they knew that you were truly being your authentic self. By staying quiet, or making the innocuous hidden statement, you've done a disservice to the LGBT community, and the hetero community as well. You refused, for years, to let people know what gay looks like and sounds like and acts like; and that gay can be just like anyone else.

“I feel like I’ve contributed monumentally to the success of the gay movement in America, and if anyone wants to argue that, I’m open to it. You’re welcome, Advocate. Why would you go down that path with somebody who’s done so much to contribute to the gay community? That was my beef about it. What more do you want me to do? Do you want me to stand on a float? And then what? It’s never enough."

No, Sean, I don't want you to stand on a float. I only wish that you would have simply stood up, because when one of us stands up, then those still seated just might follow suit.

Friday, February 05, 2010

Quote Of The Day: Sarah Silverman


In 2007, Sarah Silverman said she would not marry then-boyfriend Jimmy Kimmel until all Americans could legally marry. In an interview with The Advocate [HERE] she reiterated her position brilliantly:

"Absolutely. Not only that, but lately I’ve been really annoyed by any liberal person getting married who says they stand for gay rights. How can anyone in good conscience get married right now? How is that different than joining a country club that doesn’t allow Jews or blacks? "

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

I'll Be Having Soup'n'Soda


Campbell's Soup pledges more 'gay' ads
'2 mommies' spread only 1st in marketing agenda
Posted: January 09, 20092:01 pm Eastern© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Despite being pressured by traditional family advocates to stop, Campbell's Soup Company, maker of Swanson's brand broth, has vowed to continue spending its advertising dollars in pro-homosexual publications.
As WND reported earlier, the American Family Association objected to a Swanson's broth magazine ad that depicts a lesbian couple and their son. The ad was placed in the December 2008 and January 2009 issues of The Advocate, a magazine that touts itself with the line, "For 40 years, setting the standard in LGBT journalism."
Campbell's Soup, however, has brushed off the AFA's complaint.
MediaDailyNews quoted a company spokesperson explaining, "Inclusion and diversity play an important role in our business, and that fact is reflected in our marketing plan."
According to a Campbell's representative, "Our plans for the Swanson brand include additional placements in The Advocate."
The AFA, however, objects to the ad, particularly the frame that depicts the lesbian couple and their son with the words, "This holiday season, serve a special meal no matter the size and structure of your family."
"Not only did the ads cost Campbell's a chunk of money," writes AFA Chairman Donald Wildmon in an email alert, "but they also sent a message that homosexual parents constitute a family and are worthy of support."
Wildmon is seeking people who will contact the soup company and ask Campbell's to "stop supporting the gay agenda."
A spokesperson for Campbell's, however, explained that the advertisements are simply an attempt to reach a wide audience.
"Campbell's has been in business since 1869," spokesperson Anthony Sanzio told WND. "For more than century people from all walks of life have enjoyed our products. We will continue to try to appeal to all people in ways that are meaningful and relevant to them."
Last year, WND reported on a list of 250 U.S. businesses recognized for maintaining policies beneficial to homosexuals by the Human Rights Campaign, a group that described itself as "America's largest civil rights organization working to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality."
Campbell's Soup Company made the list of businesses.
WND also reported recently on soft drink giant, PepsiCo, who not only made the HRC list, but also maintains a highly visible presence at various "gay" pride parades, has produced a handful of commercials toying with homosexuality, boasted beating rival Diet Coke to be first in marketing to the "gay" market and contributed $500,000 to the Straight for Equality program run by Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, or PFLAG.
The AFA, as it has with Campbell's Soup, has requested supporters contact PepsiCo and ask the company to cease advocating homosexuality.
"PepsiCo has refused a request by AFA to remain neutral in the culture war," writes Wildmon in an e-mail alert. "The company indicated that it will continue major financial support of homosexual organizations."
_____________________________

Bravo Campbell's, Bravo!
When I first heard of the AFA targeting Campbell's soup for having the audacity to place an ad in The Advocate--of all places--featuring a Lesbian couple--of all things--in that ad, I immediately switched from buying the organic chicken broth I normally get, to buying Swanson's low sodium broth on my weekly trek to Kroger's.
I figure I could live without the organic broth, but I cannot live with hatred.
Donald Wildmon, the idiot head of AFA, actually says that Campbell's, by placing that ad, and scheduling more, has "sent a message that homosexual parents constitute a family and are worthy of support."
Supporting families, how unAmerican.
I could tell Wildmon what to do with his can of soup, but his head is already up his ass. Pretty crowded up there, eh Don?
Campbell's is not only saying pffffffft to the AFA--I would use much stronger language--they are ready and willing to spend more money on more ads featuring gay couples.
Now comes word that the AFA is asking Pepsi to stop advertising in gay magazines; to stop trying to sell soda to gay people; to stop "advocating homosexuality."
Advocating homosexuality? Funny, I thought they were selling soda.
So, I'll end this with a quote; I'll paraphrase Faye Dunaway as Joan Crawford in Mommie Dearest:
"Don't fuck with me AFA, this isn't my first time at the rodeo!

Monday, December 22, 2008

Those Kooky Religious Zealots!


Pro-family group stirred up over Campbell's
The American Family Association (AFA) says Christian consumers need to know that the Campbell Soup Company embraces the homosexual agenda.

Campbell Soup bought two 2-page ads in the December and January issues of The Advocate, the nation's largest homosexual magazine. The ads promote their Swanson line of broth, and one of the ads highlights the lives of two lesbians, who are portrayed as being married, along with "their" son. Other ads feature chefs from New York City. Randy Sharp, AFA's director of special projects, says concerned consumers should contact company officials and ask them to stop endorsing homosexuality.
"When you specifically target a homosexual magazine, then your company is basically endorsing these activities; you're endorsing the lifestyle," claims Sharp. "And in one ad, which...clearly shows two lesbians who say they are married, who say they have a son together, ...the Campbell Soup Company is saying 'we approve of homosexual marriage.' There is no question whatsoever of what the intentions of the company are." In an Action Alert to its supporters, AFA accuses Campbell of normalizing same-sex families. "Not only did the ads cost Campbell's a chunk of money, but they also sent a message that homosexual parents constitute a family and are worthy of support," it stated. Anthony Sanzio, a Campbell Soup Company spokesperson, tells OneNewsNow that the company reaches out to all segments of society. "We support all types of families, regardless of how they're defined, [and have done so] for more than 100 years," Sanzio offers. "We advertise in a variety of different media outlets that appeal to a broad spectrum of society. That's what we're doing here, and that's what we'll continue to do." Sanzio says to his knowledge, there has been no negative reaction regarding the ads in The Advocate.
______________________________________
Listen up AFA!
THIS is the "homosexual agenda:"

All this nonsense over soup?
Everyone knows Fags Love Soup.
I, for one, will be buying nothing but Campbells soup from now.