Ryan Andresen and his Tolerance Wall, which does not include the Boy Scouts |
Ryan Andresen is in the Boy Scouts and he recently completed
the requirements for the Eagle Scout award, which included building a
"tolerance wall" for victims of bullying like himself. Sadly, though, Ryan’s Scoutmaster would not sign off on
honoring him with the Boy Scouts’ highest ranking because Ryan Andresen is gay.
And, of course, the Boy Scouts of America [BSA] stands by
its decision, releasing a statement that, because of Andresen's sexual
orientation and that he did not agree to Scouting’s principle of ‘Duty to God,’
“he is no longer eligible for membership in Scouting.”
Ryan’s mother, Karen, says, “I want everyone to know that
[the Eagle award] should be based on accomplishment, not your sexual orientation.
Ryan entered Scouts when he was six years old and in no way knew what he was. I
think right now the Scoutmaster is sending Ryan the message that he’s not a
valued human being and I want Ryan to know that he is valued … and that people
care about him.”
Oh, Ryan is valued, because Ryan is standing up to all those
who have bullied him throughout the years, the latest of which is the Boy
Scouts of America. And, as is the case with bullies, like the BSA, they wait
until just the right moment to strike.
See, Ryan Andresen came out as gay last July, and the
Scoutmaster knew about it. But he said nothing, and did nothing, until it was
time to sign off on Ryan’s award as an Eagle Scout and then suddenly, it mattered
that Ryan Andresen is gay. The Scoutmaster isn’t talking these days, as bullies often
do.
But Deron Smith, spokestool for the BSA, is talking and said that Andresen
recently "notified his unit leadership and Eagle Scout Counselor that he
does not agree to Scouting’s principle of 'Duty to God' and does not meet
Scouting’s membership standard on sexual orientation. While the BSA did not
proactively ask for this information, based on his statements and after
discussion with his family he is being informed that he is no longer eligible
for membership in Scouting.”
Oh, so the Boy Scouts want to play the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell
routine? Do they not know how that worked out for the military, or are they so
stuck in the Dark Ages and so far behind the times, that they cannot see the
future?
Ryan’s family is disputing the BSA statement, saying, “The
Boy Scouts of America's statement that Ryan does not agree to Scouting's
principle of 'Duty to God' is inaccurate. Ryan has never said that he does not
believe in a higher power, and the only reason he's being denied the rank of
Eagle is because the Boy Scouts of America has a problem with Ryan being
gay."
So, you have to be a straight male Christian to be an Eagle Scout. Sounds like a wonderful organization, bent on teaching young
boys the value of homophobia and religious intolerance and, well, bullying. I would bet Ryan Andresen is better off getting out of that
group. And I bet it will be quite a while before the BSA finds itself added to
anyone’s Wall of Tolerance.
source
source
homophobia is alive and well; perhaps the southern poverty law center can place the BSA on its list of hate groups.
ReplyDeleteHow discouraging. I was hoping the BSA would back down on this one. Sometimes it is easier to homophobic in the abstract and more difficult when you have to look an outstandind young man in the face and show him your bigotry.
ReplyDeleteI guess BSA had no problem with that.
I think the BSA needs to change it's tune post haste.
ReplyDeleteFor example, I was a scout. Had no intention of doing the Eagle Scout route, that smacked a little too much of kiss ass to me.
However in both troops in which I was a member I know I wasn't the only gay kid.
And the religiosity thing about the scouts, I was a non-believe at the time, still am for that matter. They wouldn't have me if they knew.
And the sheer number of Eagle Scouts who have sent back their badges, it's interesting to see the BSA non acknowledgment of the fact.
Really nice Ryan Andresen!
ReplyDeleteMiami Jeep
I think it's ridiculous that the BSA think this is acceptable, but it is their right as a private organization. That doesn't mean people have to support them though. The only concern that leads me to is that that the organization may only become more and more conservative and extreme. I would say that would be the nail in the coffin, but I'm sure that The Liberty Council would be more than happy to support those ideals.
ReplyDelete