"I think it is very anti-Christian [to
hate gay people]. It is the antithesis of what I believe. It is the antithesis
of what you should believe if you believe in Jesus. It’s not what he taught,
it’s the opposite of what he taught. If Jesus was to walk the Earth today, or
Buddha or anybody, they would be horrified. Those people saying they’re doing
it in the name of God? No no no no no. I speak as a Christian person, and as a
woman and as an artist. I would love nothing more for my friends who love each
other to get married. I don’t think it’s a sin, I think we’re born how we’re
born. Look at me, I’m 4’11’’, and so if it was a sin to be short, what would I
do? Well I’d just be, you know, it’s how God made me."
I love KC. And so it’s nice
to see her talk about how she can combine faith and acceptance and
understanding that we are all—if you so choose to believe—God’s children.
We’re born how we’re born.
Get used to it.
Chris Culliver, of the San Francisco 49ers, who made headlines when he
said gays were not welcome in the locker room, on his meeting with The
Trevor Project:
"As an African American male, I should know better. Hate and
discrimination have a lasting effect, and words matter. I also have a
responsibility to myself, and especially to my young fans to be a better role
model. The kids who look up to me and other athletes are the future of our
country, and our future deserves better than fear, hate and discrimination... I
was wrong, and I want to learn how to make it right. That's why I reached out
to an organization called The Trevor Project... No child should ever feel like
they are less than anyone else, and God has put me through this storm so I can
learn from my mistakes and help make sure no child has to feel that way,
again."
I'd like to withhold praise, for now. The cynic in me
sometimes wonders if, after some people get nailed for their homophobic rants
or Tweets, and they suddenly become so, um, tolerant, if it isn’t just an act
to repair their tarnished image.
I’m hoping Culliver means what he says today more than what
he said a couple of months ago.
"I believe that marriage is a
relationship between a man and a women, and that's because I believe the ideal
setting for raising a child is where there's a mother and a father in the home.
Other people have differing views and I respect that, whether that's in my
party or in the Democratic Party. But these are very personal matters. My hope
is that when we discuss things of this nature, we show respect for people who
have differing views."
Yes, he’ll be respectful of
my view that marriage should be equal but he doesn’t share that view.
And, sorry Mittsy The
Unelectable, but it’s not a personal issue, it’s a matter of equality, legality
and discrimination.
Believe what you want,
legislate equality.
“As the president who signed the act into
law, I have come to believe that DOMA is contrary to those principles and, in
fact, incompatible with our Constitution. ... When I signed the bill, I
included a statement with the admonition that 'enactment of this legislation
should not, despite the fierce and at times divisive rhetoric surrounding it,
be understood to provide an excuse for discrimination.' Reading those words
today, I know now that, even worse than providing an excuse for discrimination,
the law is itself discriminatory. It should be overturned."
Nicely said.
And while I was angry at the
time of the signing of DOMA, I am pleased to see that Clinton has come around
and realized that separate is never, has never been, and will never be, equal.
"Suga" Rashad Evans, UFC fighter, signing the amicus brief sent to
SCOTUS by Brendon Ayanbadejo and Chris Kluwe:
“I've never been a homophobe, never understood what that is all about. I
knew some people who were gay and never cared about their sexuality. But at the
same time, I didn't fully understand the issues around gay people until my
friend BA [Brendan Ayanbadejo] started telling me about his full public support
for gay marriage. We talked about the issue and I decided it’s not enough to
not be against a minority, if you want things to go better for them you have to
speak up with them. ... I'm a UFC fighter, a macho-type sport. I am a
heterosexual guy in a tough macho sport, which is exactly the reason I feel a
duty to say I support gay marriage and gay rights. ... I have nothing to
gain personally from supporting this issue, and that's the point. Society as a
whole is better when there is equality, and I want to live in a country where
everyone has the same rights because we all benefit from that. ... What
people overlook is that it isn't a sex issue, it’s a love issue. There's no
justifiable reason for trying to get in the way of two people who love each
other. ... I have kids. I don't want them growing up in a society where
they, or their friends, could be second class citizens based on which person
they fall in love with or who they want to be happy with.”
Welcome to the club, “Suga,” and thanks for stating it all
so beautifully.
"I’m not going to kiss ass with somebody like that...I felt that what
he said about the gay community was disappointing because a lot of gay people
work for him. It’s just sad. I thought he could have done better for his
country than just go to the lowest common denominator and stir up the crap.
It’s our country, it’s not wrestling. If you try and make our president fail,
it doesn’t matter who he is, you make our country fail. And if you really are a
patriot, if you really give a sh*t about our country, you don’t do stuff like
that. First of all, you’re an entertainer, and you make ugly buildings, and
you’re famous for it. And you have a reality show with very high ratings. Don’t
step into the forum like that. Become educated with facts. Don’t just be a
sh*t-stirrer. Our country is in trouble and he keeps wanting to make [Obama]
fail. Let’s call a spade a spade. The guy’s
a black man and that’s your issue? What kind of idiot are you? Come on.”
Team Cyndi. All the way.
Peter Tatchell, British activist, on the
Queen's signing of the new Commonwealth Charter--which some say is a sign
of her support for LGBT right:
"Media reports are wrong. The Queen
has NOT expressed support for LGBT equality. The Commonwealth Charter that
she’s signing includes no pledge on LGBT rights. LGBT rights were deliberately
excluded. In 61 years as Queen, she has never publicly uttered the words lesbian
or gay. She is a patron of hundreds of charities but none of them are gay ones.
Not once has she visited or supported a gay charity. For the last four years,
I’ve been pressing Buckingham Palace over the Queen’s failure to acknowledge
the existence of LGBT people - and got nowhere. ... The
Commonwealth Charter does not include any specific rejection of discrimination
based on sexual orientation or gender identity. This was vetoed by the
homophobic majority of member states. They blocked its inclusion in the
charter. This makes the Queen’s signing of the charter even less of a big deal.
It is certainly not the breakthrough for LGBT rights that some people are
claiming."
Let’s be clear, the Queen is not about the queens.
Jeanne Ives, Illinois Republican Representative, on voting
against marriage equality:
"They're trying to redefine marriage. It's a completely disordered relationship
and when you have a disordered relationship, you don’t ever get order out of
that. So I’m more than happy to take a 'no' vote on the issue of homosexual
marriage. … I'm more than happy to stand up and take a courageous vote here on
this issue because it's the right thing to do. Essentially what they’re trying
to do is not just redefine marriage, they’re trying to redefine society.
They’re trying to weasel their way into acceptability so that they can then
start to push their agenda down into the schools, because this gives them some
sort of legitimacy. And we can’t allow that to happen. The rights to marriage,
it's really a natural right. It’s the natural right of the child to be
with both parents, either in an adoptive nature or in a biological nature. To
not have a mother and a father is really a disordered state for a child to grow
up in and it really makes that child an object of desire rather than the result
of a matrimony."
Where, oh where, to begin.
First off, Jeanne, you’re an idiot. Tell me how I am
redefining marriage? Tell me how I am weaseling my way into being accepted, and
then tell me why I need to be accepted by the likes of you. Tell me why you’ve
just said children in single-parent homes are less well-off than children in
two-parents, oops, mommy and daddy only, homes.
You can’t keep spouting the same nonsense and not be asked
to explain why …. And just repeating it is not an explanation. So, maybe,
Jeanne, once your brain clicks in, you’re realize you aren’t being courageous,
you’re just goose-stepping along with the bigots and homophobes, and is that
really where you want to go?
What you say!
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure how two men committed to raising a child are worse than all the heterosexual men who walk away from their children.
ReplyDeleteI have always loved me some Cyndi Lauper and that statement was right on! GO CYNDI!
ReplyDeletePs...her reality show is really good. Have you been watching?
"To not have a mother and a father is really a disordered state for a child to grow up in"
ReplyDeletehey you dumb blond beeyotch, try growing up in an ABUSIVE mother/father traditional household; talk about DISORDERED! it's no wonder I needed 4 years of therapy!
@robert
ReplyDeleteI haven't seen her show yet, maybe I'll look for it.
I does love me some Cyndi!
I would have kept going to church if there a lot more people like KC attending them.
ReplyDeleteI don't know about giving Chris Culliver a pass yet, but it's worth noting he didn't say this from a PR written statement like his apology was.