"Why should the equal protection argument be made in
favor of homosexual behavior, which is changeable? People are not
naturally homosexual, so the definition of 'person' in the Fourteenth Amendment
is being twisted to make this assumption. 'Person' should be understood based
on historic, beneficial, or at least neutral and fact-based traits; it should
not be twisted to incorporate behavior that most religions and most cultures
have said a firm 'no' to. It's also behavior for which there's no recognized science
demonstrating a genetic or hormonal origin. And it's also not beneficial
and does not stand the definition of marriage, used for millenia - that is, the
act of consummation. It's another sad fact of homosexual behavior that two
men or two women can never consummate a marriage; they can never conceive
children together. This should still have some standing and it remains a fact
that there are only two types of human in the world: male and female. Any
other distinctions made are appearance, custom, and construction. So
marriage is the lawful, orderly confirmation of what we already see in nature.
The Supreme Court says they will give their decision in June. Pray,
friends, for truth to prevail."
Actually, Linda, gay men and women can consummate their relationships,
though maybe it's different from how you consummate yours. Consummate
doesn’t mean procreate.
Marriage is a union of consenting adults.
Deal with it.
And get a new hairstyle, it's not 1952 anymore.
“Here
they go again. It’s bad enough that Speaker Boehner and House Republicans are
wasting taxpayer dollars to defend the indefensible Defense of Marriage
Act--and losing in every case. Now, they have reached a new low--signing a
secret contract to spend more public money on their legal boondoggle without
informing Democrats. Their actions are simply unconscionable; their decisions
are utterly irresponsible....Hiding this contract from voters in the midst of
an election season was a cynical move at best, and a betrayal of the public
trust at worst. With Americans focused on the creation of jobs and the growth
of our economy, Republicans should not be spending $2 million to defend
discrimination in our country. We should be embracing our tradition of
equality, advancing our promise of opportunity, and securing justice and equal
rights for every American....With DOMA now before the Supreme Court, there is
no end in sight for the Republican legal effort. It’s time for the Speaker and
his Republican colleagues to come clean about their plans. Until then, we look
forward to the day when DOMA is discarded by the highest court in the land and
when all of America’s families can know the blessings of equal protection under
the law.”
Further
proof, even though we don't need it, that the GOP isn't concerned about jobs, unemployed
Americans, the economy, the environment; it’s more worried about keeping its
nose in other people’s business.
They
want to stop The Gays from achieving equality.
Same
GOP, different day.
"We have turned our back on God. I mean millions of
people have decided that God doesn't exist, or he's irrelevant to me and we
have killed fifty-four million babies and the institution of marriage is right
on the verge of a complete redefinition. Believe me, that is going to
have consequences too. And a lot of these things are happening around us, and
somebody is going to get mad at me for saying what I am about to say right now,
but I am going to give you my honest opinion: I think we have turned our back
on the Scripture and on God Almighty and I think he has allowed judgment to
fall upon us. I think that's what's going on."
And so he wonders why people might choose to believe God doesn’t
exist?
Well, if God gets so mad at folks for questioning his, or
her, existence, that he or she allows children to be murdered in school, then
he or she ain't much of a God.
“Definitely.
I assume there will be some Supreme Court appointments in this next term; that
alone was reason to vote for him. I don’t think I said anything a lot of people
weren’t thinking. It’s easier now more than ever in my life to feel the fix is
in, the game is rigged and no matter how hard you work to change things, it
just doesn’t matter.”
Look,
even when you are critical of a candidate, it doesn't mean you'll switch
parties.
It
means you have questions, and sometimes your candidate is giving the answers
you want to hear.
That's
the whole idea behind voting and candidates and elections.
Listen.
And ask questions.
Pat McEwen, "pastor", on the Newtown murders being revenge
from God for taking Him/her out of the public schools:
"Watching the Memorial service for the twenty-six precious
lives taken from us was painful to say the least, but it was far more painful
to the God who made America great. Newtown cancelled Christmas so it could
properly mourn. How foolish, yet typical of governmental strategy to replace
God. The 'Interfaith' service was an affront to Almighty God. Those claiming to
be His priests barely mentioned His Name --Jesus! After all, He is the only God
there is! What happened? We violently removed the fear of Almighty God from the
hearts of our children. We expelled God from school and banished Him from the
schoolyard. He was replaced with metal detectors, condoms, policemen,
anti-bullying policies, No-gun zones, and violence of unprecedented order. Our
strategy has replaced God's Truth. We are losing our kids because we are
ignoring God's Law."
He's angry that a town cancelled celebrations of Christmas in
order to mourn for dead children and teachers? This is called being a
Christian?
He's angry that the church services included all faiths? This
is called acceptance?
He's somehow saying, like other asshats, that if you ignore
God he'll kill children? This is faith?
Then he can have it.
“Well,
normally I’d say no to nudity, but I just did a lot of it playing the long-term
partner of Liberace, Scott Thorson, in Behind the Candelabra. I mean, it’s
tastefully done. Steven Soderbergh directed it, and Michael Douglas plays
Liberace. But this movie’s not going to be for everyone. These two men were
deeply in love and in a real relationship—a marriage—long before there was gay
marriage. That’s not an insignificant thing. The script is beautiful and
relatable. Their conversations when they’re dressing or undressing or having a
spat or getting ready for bed? That’s every marriage. It feels like you’re
witnessing something really intimate you would normally see with a man and a
woman, but instead it’s two men, which was thrilling. There’s stuff I think
will make people uncomfortable. Great. It’s HBO—they can change the
channel."
Well
said.
People
are people, gay and straight, and, when it comes right down to it, we're all
very much alike in our relationships.
Except
for the gender thingy.
Joe Lieberman, in the final days of his 24-year career in
politics, saying he's changed his mind about term limits:
“My position on this has changed, I’ve always felt that there
are term limits for senators — it’s six years and it’s up to voters to decide
whether they want somebody to go on, and you need some people around here with
some experience. [But now] I’m beginning to feel now that the place needs to
change more often. I think the place might be healthier and less partisan and
more rigid if it turned over more often.”
Of course he waits until he's done before he advocates term
limits.
Typical bull-sh*t from a career politician.
“We
both have a lot of gay friends, and we were not going to screw this up or
bulls–t it. It wasn’t the most natural thing in the world to do, though. Like,
for one scene, I had to come out of a pool, go over to Michael, straddle him on
a chaise longue and start kissing him. And throughout the script, it’s not like
I kiss him just once. We drew it up like a football plan… I remember asking
Heath Ledger after Brokeback Mountain, “How’d you do that scene with
Jake?”—meaning the scene where they start ferociously kissing. He said, “Well,
mate, I drank a half case of beer in my trailer.” I started laughing, and he
goes, “No, I’m serious. I needed to just go for it. If you can’t do that,
you’re not making the movie. Michael was a wonderful kisser. My concerns ended
up mattering a lot less once we were filming."
I've
never understood how the press always wants to know how difficult it is to do a
same-sex kissing scene, but they have no questions about playing murderers and
rapists and adulterers.
“I had
a little mishap on Twitter about a month ago, and it was just brought to my
attention this morning. I’d just like to apologize for anything that was said.
A buddy and I were having a little conversation. I had a poor attempt at humor
and an even worse attempt at using a term I shouldn’t have used. I hope I
didn’t offend anybody. I’m really sorry my first introduction to being a New
York Met had to be like this."
First
off, it wasn’t a mishap, unless you don’t know how to spell. You said the word ‘fag’
and meant to say the word ‘fag’.
It isn’t
humorous.
“I
never denied those rumors because I was offended and didn’t want to offend my
friends who were gay—as if being gay were some kind of f–king disease. It put
me in a weird position in that sense. The whole thing was just gross. But look,
there have been great signs of progress—the fact that Anderson Cooper and Ellen
DeGeneres can come out so beautifully and powerfully, and it’s a big f–king
deal that it turns out nobody gives a s–t. If Liberace were alive today,
everybody would love his music and nobody would care what he did in his private
life. Like with Elton John.”
I.Love.Matt.Damon.
Another fabulous post Bob! Where do I start? First, I never cease to be amazed at how straights are such experts on what being gay means. They are so sure that it is a choice. That mindless stupidity never changes.
ReplyDeleteMatt Damon? No, he isn't gay. That's wishful thinking by some gays. However, he does play gay very well so I can understand the confusion.
And finally all this crapola about God being mad because he's not worshipped enough so he's going to kill six year old to make a point. More mindless stupidity from the same haters that never changes.
Matt Damon is a good egg.
ReplyDeleteLinda Harvey is a total CUNT, and she is a pathological liar. And that's the most Christian thing I can say about her.
ReplyDeleteLinda makes some excellent points. I'm a fan!
ReplyDeleteWho is Noah Syndergaard? The fact it took a month to point out his failed attempt at humor tells me we'll still have no idea who he is a couple of years from now.
ReplyDeleteAncient Greek dudes blew other ancient Greek dudes back in the Archaic period & that's back when being gay was accepted and normal. Well we see what happened to their civilization. Rejecting it IS the way of the 21st century. Get with the modern times people.
ReplyDeletecunts and dicks abounding in this post, including anonymous.
ReplyDeletethere is no god; get over it.
Matt. Is. Awesome. :)
ReplyDelete