President Obama, on if he thinks there will be nationwide marriage equality while still in office:
"The Supreme Court now is going to be taking on a case, my hope is that they go ahead and recognize what I think the majority of people in America now recognize which is that two people who love each other and are treating each other with respect and aren't bothering anybody else, why would the law treat them differently? There's no good reason for it. So as a consequence, I'm hopeful the Supreme Court comes to the right decision, but I will tell you, peoples' hearts have opened up on this issue. People know that treating folks unfairly, even if you disagree with their lifestyle choice, they're not bothering you. Let them live their lives and under the law they should be treated equally and as far as me personally, just to see all the loving gay and lesbian couples that I know who are great parents and great partners, the idea that we wouldn't treat them like the brothers and sisters that they are, that doesn't make any sense."
I’m loving that he’s still talking openly about this issue, though, yes, I wish he hadn’t called it a “lifestyle choice” because it’s neither.
It’s a life.
|
It does get complicated. During the Paris attacks I watched a number of reporters stumble over trying to ID a man who saved a bunch of hostages. They called him African American, er African Europeon, er..... Just call him a hero sez I.
ReplyDeleteBob,
ReplyDeleteYou're right, the term "lifestyle choice", some people, no matter how well meaning still think we made a "choice". I just shake my head. Ben Carson? Dumb, dumb and dumber. Cumberbatch's foot in mouth, methinks sometimes this political correctness is taken too far. We all know what he meant. "Lifestyle choice" is wrong but "color" or "colour"? Get over it those offended. My humble opinion of course.
Ron
Re B.C.'s 'coloured' comment:-
ReplyDeleteI'm totally confused as to what is and what isn't acceptable these days. I don't see the word as being disrespectful at all and I think the vast majority of we Brits wouldn't find it so either. David Ayelowo is absolutely correct in stating that all this hullabaloo (which seems, frankly, ridiculous from this side of the pond) obscuring the very valid point that Benny C. was trying to make. If he felt he had to apologise for inadvertently causing offence I think he was wrong to go on and cut himself up about it, referring to himself as an 'idiot'. Of course he wasn't and isn't. His sole 'error' was to be no more up-to-date on the latest proscribed words than most of us are.
Btw: In my books the word 'coloured' is more useful in that it covers those of Asian origin (Indian sub-continent as well as Chinese, Japanese, Malaysian etc) in addition to African. I shouldn't be at all surprised that in decades to come the terms of 'people of colour' or 'African-American' are also deemed to be demeaning to those being referred.
So what term would be allowable nowadays? Non-Caucasian? Search me!
Oh, almost forgot . . .. Billyt Crystal . . . . Mr. Ego with a giant E. Never did take him seriously. He was just lucky to be in the right place at the right time to gain some measure of fame and fortune. Some people just step in shit but can't help shitting themselves.
ReplyDelete"It really is that simple; if you know a gay person, you’ll find out they aren’t so different from anybody else, and you’ll more than likely stand up for them." - SO TRUE! :)
ReplyDeleteI am a great believer in mixing race, gender, religion and sexual identity at school so that children can learn that we are all the same despite these minor differences.
ReplyDeletehmmm. what would the National Association of COLORED People say about Mr. C's comment, i wonder......
ReplyDelete..left out the "for the Advancement of...." it's been that kind of night, oy.
ReplyDeletesmh.