Monday, December 30, 2013

ISBL Asshat of the Week: Georgia Congressman Jack Kingston

It seems that most politicians today have a model upon which they base their candidacy and that seems fair; you take a look at what’s worked in the past for other politicians and then you follow that lead.

Trouble is, the one person’s lead you should never follow is Newt Gingrich.

Back in November 2011, the serial adulterer and former House Speaker received a fair amount of criticism when he suggested that schools in low-income neighborhoods fire their janitorial staffs and have those low-income family children clean the schools instead:
"You say to somebody, you shouldn't go to work before you're what, 14, 16 years of age, fine. You're totally poor. You're in a school that is failing with a teacher that is failing. I've tried for years to have a very simple model. Most of these schools ought to get rid of the unionized janitors, have one master janitor and pay local students to take care of the school. The kids would actually do the work, they would have cash, they would have pride in the schools, they'd begin the process of rising."
Yeah, he did, and he was soundly drummed over the head because of his views. Get those poor kids outta bed and have ‘;em mop the halls and dump the trash and sweep the floors and then go to school all day and when they’re done, have them wash windows and scrub toilets and clean urinals.

Who in their right mind would use Newt Gingrich as a role model?

Fellow Georgian and Congressman Jack Kingston for one. But he doesn’t want the poor kids cleaning schools for no reason; he wants them to clean the schools so they can pay for their lunch and is set to propose a new law that low-income children do some manual labor in exchange for their subsidized meals. Under the meal program, children from families with incomes at or below 130 percent of the poverty line are eligible for free meals, while students from families with incomes between 130 percent and 185 percent of the poverty level can receive lunches at reduced prices.

Kingston is saying “No lunch for you!”

He says children, at least those poor ones that won’t amount to anything anyway, should have to pay at least a nominal amount or do some work like sweeping cafeteria floors:
"But one of the things I’ve talked to the secretary of agriculture about: Why don’t you have the kids pay a dime, pay a nickel to instill in them that there is, in fact, no such thing as a free lunch? Or maybe sweep the floor of the cafeteria -- and yes, I understand that that would be an administrative problem, and I understand that it would probably lose you money. But think what we would gain as a society in getting people -- getting the myth out of their head that there is such a thing as a free lunch."
He doesn’t seem to realize that he’s punishing the children for something out of their control: family income. And even more, he doesn’t seem to understand that he is creating a world of embarrassment for those students who have to sweep before eating while the kids from the wealthier families simply  sit and have a nice lunch.

And now the school lunch has hit the fan and Kingston’s ‘people’ are scrambling; Kingston spokesman Chris Crawford, doing damage control:
"It is sad that trying to have a productive conversation about instilling a strong work ethic in the next generation of Americans so quickly devolves into the usual name-calling partisan hysteria. Having worked from a young age himself, Congressman Kingston understands the value of hard work and the important role it plays in shaping young people."
There’s something to be said about working from a young age to instill a sense of pride in yourself, to see that hard work pays off, to realize that you can take care of yourself and buy yourself the things you want and need because you work.

Telling school children they have to clean the cafeteria before they can have lunch is not the same thing.

The good news is that Jack Kingston will probably be out of a job soon; he is running against seven other Republicans in the 2014 primary to replace retiring Senator Saxby Chambliss, and the expected winner of that race will face Democrat Michelle Nunn, who probably thinks kids should be in school to learn, not clean up.

6 comments:

the dogs' mother said...

We have kids here who work in the cafeteria for free lunch but it is voluntary. The twins did it in elementary school. Eldest because he has always been a bottom line thinker and Daughter because it was fun and different thing to do.

Professor Chaos said...

The best part was when he tried to walk it back a bit saying "hey, I never said POOR kids!" Because obviously he meant all those affluent kids who receive free school lunch

Debbie said...

I say we have HIS kids sweep up after the POOR kids so that HIS kids don't grow up with that malady of the wealthy, "AFFLUENZA". dickwad.

designing wally said...

We're giving South Carolina a little competition over here lately.
Again...

anne marie in philly said...

such "christian values"; hypocritical asshat!

Helen Lashbrook said...

Children are given free lunches to enable them to work better at school; for many children that school meal is their only meal. Breakfast clubs are there for the same reason. Why should children be thankful for being fed? Is the Congressman thankful for the nice job he has being paid to sit around and enact no legislation worth mentioning or does he think he is owed the position after his 'slave labour' as a child?