Showing posts with label Gay Sex. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gay Sex. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 03, 2024
Meme Dump
Labels:
Cock-a-tales,
Coffee,
DUI,
Funny,
Garden,
Gay Sex,
Grifter,
JD Vance,
Kamala Harris,
Ketanji Brown Jackson,
MAGAts,
Meme,
Military,
Publicity Stunt,
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,
Tim Walz,
Weird,
Women,
Women Of Color
Tuesday, May 14, 2024
Meme Dump
Labels:
Barron,
Christian Nationalism,
Funny,
Gay Sex,
GOP,
Grifter,
Guns,
Kristi Noem,
Melanie,
Meme,
Police,
Religion,
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,
Separation Of Church and State,
Stormy Daniels,
Uvalde,
Women's Rights
Thursday, June 02, 2016
Random Musings
Labels:
Anti-LGBTQ+,
Bathroom Bills,
Bob,
Carlos,
Cinco de Never,
Coming Out,
Gay Sex,
Ghana,
Homophobia,
Hot Men,
Magazines,
Musings,
News,
Texas,
X
Monday, May 11, 2015
Cat Fight! Andy and Lance
Wednesday, December 03, 2014
Rub-A-Dub-Dub ... Escorts In A Tub
Labels:
Assault,
Escorts,
Funny,
Gay Sex,
Ridiculous,
South Carolina
Thursday, September 12, 2013
AFA's Ray Rooney: The ‘Problem’ With The Gays Is We Like To Talk About Our Sex Lives
It’s pretty safe to assume that I am not a fan of
homophobic, anti-gay American Family Association [AFA] and its spokesbigot
Bryan Fischer, but sometimes, sometimes, you
gotta look at them, and him, and just laugh. I mean, no one, not even LGBT
rights groups, spend more of their and effort talking about The Gays and sex
than the AFA, so either they’re really interested, or they’re taking lessons.
But the part that makes me laugh about the AFA today is a
blog post by one of their minions, Ray Rooney, who says the problem with The
Gays is that we want to talk about how we have sex, and with whom, and how we
do it, and how often.
That came as news to me, but I’ll ask you, dear readers, to
take a moment — and you may need more time — to peruse this blog thingy for all
the times I’ve discussed how I have sex with Carlos, the, um, in-and-outs, as
it were, of our sexual relationship. I’d say I’ll wait, but there’s no need to
look for I have never discussed our sex life because it’s nunya bidness, as they say. And then head over to the Human Rights Campaign or Freedom To Marry or GLAAD or any other LGBT rights group and see how often they mention gay sex.
Still, this week AFA
blogger Ray Rooney Jr. penned a column entitled “The Real Problem With
Homosexuality” in which he says that the real reason homosexuality is wrong is
because The Gays want everyone to know that they have sex with someone of the
same sex:
“What I find perverse about homosexuality is the insistence from the gay community that I should know about their sexual proclivities. Normal people understand that sex is an extremely intimate and therefore private act. I would find it troubling, if not disgusting, for anyone to talk publicly about what kind of sex they like to practice. Normal people do not want to broadcast to the world the details of their sex lives. There is something wrong with those who want complete strangers to know who they like to have sex with.
Medical statistics tell me homosexuality is unhealthy. My Christian faith teaches me it is unrighteous. Common sense tells me it is unfruitful and unnatural. But none of that is why I am fed up with the gay community. I’m just sick of hearing about how one group of people demand that everyone in the world accept who they want to have sex with!
I wonder if all the stories making the news today about bakers and florists being forced to cater to homosexuals would be stories but for people announcing who they like to have sex with? I mean, did the offended customers come in and ask for a wedding cake or flowers for their wedding and were denied service because they looked like homosexuals? Or did the customer come in and announce their sexual preference and then demand service? I suspect the latter.
I believe homosexuality is wrong. Just like I believe adultery and sex outside of marriage is wrong. But even though I believe I have good reasons for opposing homosexuality as a normative lifestyle based on science, medicine, and faith, that is not why I strongly oppose it. I believe anyone who insists everyone know what they do in their bedroom and with whom is perverse. Normal people do not define themselves solely on the basis of who they are sexually attracted to.”
Wow, what a delusional
asshat, because, if I had a nickel for every time I’ve heard or seen straight
folks having sex — like nearly every night on my TV — I’d be rich as Donald
Freaking Trump, only with better, real, hair.
Sure some gay folks
talk about their sex lives, and even discuss it in detail, but so do straight
people, and, for the record, Ray Rooney, being gay isn’t just sex, it’s about
attraction, and compatibility and love and togetherness and sex; the same exact
things as being straight, except we’re attracted to people of our own gender. We actually aren’t
any different from straight folks, except in one key area: we are attracted to
members of our own sex.
And that’s that.
The people who seem to want to discuss The Gays and how they have sex, and why
they have sex, and with whom, really seem to be those anti-gay groups. They
seem to think that if they discuss what we do—or at least what they imagine we
do when they are home alone, under the covers, with a jar of hand lotion and a
c*m rag—that straight people will join their fight.
Labels:
AFA,
Anti-LGBTQ+,
Gay Sex,
Homophobia,
Ridiculous,
Sex
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
In Baton Rouge Consensual Gay Sex Can Still Get You Arrested
![]() |
| Sid Gautreaux |
You know how folks make jokes
about the South and how backwards it all seems? Turns out, sometimes, hell, a
lot of the time, it’s true. Like this story from down in Baton Rouge, Louisiana,
where it appears that the Sheriff’s Office has been conducting stings to find
men willing to have consensual gay
sex and then arresting them for, ahem, crimes against nature.
Now, there isn’t a hint that
any money changed hands, so these crimes cannot be considered prostitution;
these are men, adult men, consenting to have sex with other adult men in the
privacy of one of the men’s homes. And yet, for the East Baton Rouge Sheriff’s
Office, that warrants arrest after arrest; at least a dozen since 2011,
with the most recent occurring about two weeks ago.
These men arrested for the crimes of consensual sex, have
never been prosecuted because they have committed no crime; consensual sex
between two adults, two adult males, is not a crime, even in Louisiana. But
still, men are being arrested and jailed and paying fines for doing nothing
wrong.
Casey Rayborn Hicks, a spokeswoman for the Sheriff’s Office,
released a statement, and she and the department clearly do not realize that
they aren’t arresting criminals:
“This is a law that is currently on the Louisiana books, and the sheriff is charged with enforcing the laws passed by our Louisiana Legislature. Whether the law is valid is something for the courts to determine, but the sheriff will enforce the laws that are enacted. … The issue here is not the nature of the relationship but the location.
These are not bars. These are parks. These are family environments. Manchac Park, where the stings have largely taken place, has been known as a place where “cruising” for anonymous sex takes place, but neither talking about sex nor agreeing to sex are violations of obscenity laws.”
But the men are not having sex in the park, or in any other public
place; after being propositioned by the undercover officers, the men go to
their own homes, and that is where they are arrested. Apparently just having
sex violates the law in Louisiana.
Except it’s not supposed to violate the law. When Lawrence v
Texas—a landmark decision by the Supreme Court striking down sodomy laws in
Texas, and thirteen other states, including Louisiana—then-Louisiana Attorney
General Richard Ieyoub issued a statement asserting that the state’s
anti-sodomy law could not be enforced, except in cases of prostitution and
bestiality.
And yet, in backwards Louisiana the law stayed on the books for a sheriff, Sid Gautreaux, who has nothing better to do than to troll
parks asking men to have sex with undercover officers, to use as a weapon. And is now claiming ignorance
as his excuse, with his office releasing a new statement:
"To our knowledge, the Sheriff’s office was never contacted or told that the law was not enforceable or prosecutable."
And that lame explanation, the excuse of ignorance of the law,
isn’t sitting too well with at least one Louisiana lawmaker, Baton Rouge Metro
Councilman John Delgado:
“Does [Gautreaux] know that slavery is no longer around? Does he know that we have cars and no longer horse and buggies?”
Delgado is demanding apologies be issued to the 12 men who
were arrested.
Gautreaux's office is now saying they will no longer
enforce the out-dated law, and will work with state legislators to have it
removed from the books. But that doesn’t explain the hows and whys that the
sheriff’s office targeted these men, nor does it explain their strange explanation
for doing so:
“The Sheriff’s Office has not, nor will it ever, set out with the intent to target or embarrass any part of our law-abiding community. Our goal is to Protect and Serve the public. When we receive calls from the public about lewd activity near our children, we have to respond. Our park operations, conducted at the specific request of the BREC Park’s Ranger, were an attempt to deter or stop lewd activity occurring in the park near children.
The deputies in the cases were acting in good faith using a statute that was still on the books of the Louisiana criminal code. The deputies used a statute that they felt fit the situation in order to remedy the concerns of the parents and park officials. The deputies presented sworn affidavits of probable cause, a set of circumstances that would lead a normal person to believe that a crime has been committed or will be committed, to judges for review. In the cases we have reviewed, the judges set bond, in effect concurring that there was probable cause for arrest. To our knowledge, the Sheriff’s office was never contacted or told that the law was not enforceable or prosecutable.
In hindsight, however, we feel we should have taken a different approach. We will consult with others in the legislative and judicial branches to see what can be done to remove this law from the criminal code that each deputy receives and to also find alternative ways to deter sexual and lewd activity from our parks.
We want to reiterate our intent in these cases. It was NEVER to target a certain segment of our population. It was only in response to parents, park officials and members of the public concerned that our parks were not safe. When we receive reports of public masturbation, sex and other lewd activity in a park where children are playing, me MUST take these concerns seriously. Our intent was honorable, our approach, however, is something we must evaluate and change.
The Sheriff’s Office is not concerned with what consenting adults do in private residences. We are concerned with what is going on in public, especially a public place frequented by children. In light of new information, we feel that we need to work with our deputies to provide them with better resources and training to deal with these issues in more appropriate ways. It is very important to us that the public understands our intent and agenda was safety and never prejudiced toward any group.”
They never intended to target gay men, they just approached
gay men and asked if they wanted to have sex, went back to the man’s apartment
with him, and then placed him under arrest using a law that has been declared
unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
Back.Wards. And this is why the South gets a bad rap.
via Think Progress
Thursday, April 11, 2013
Random Musings
Labels:
Arizona,
Ben Carson,
Blog,
Cher,
Civil Union,
Democrat,
DOMA,
Funny,
Gay Sex,
Hot Men,
Margaret Thatcher,
Marriage Equality,
Mitch McConnell,
Montana,
Musings,
Oklahoma,
Orrin Hatch,
Same-sex Couples,
Walmart,
X
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)























































