John Aravosis, from Americablog, on Latifah’s refusal to discuss her ALLEGED gay-ness:
“One big problem with Latifah’s position is that she’s sending a message that there is a problem. She’s signaling that there’s something wrong with being gay. … People can defend Latifah’s choice, claiming that she has a right to privacy. And Latifah can talk all she wants about her desire to protect her “private life.” But straight Americans – and particularly celebrities – don’t invoke the right to privacy when you simply inquire about the well-being of their spouse. And they don’t rail about their “private life” when you ask, “how goes the girlfriend? ...The only time celebrities try to hide who they’re dating is when it’s someone else’s spouse, an underage child, an animal, a corpse, or a gay.”
Silence in speaking about your sexual orientation or your dating life, is totally tour business, but Aravosis is right that, in keeping silent, you feed the notion that the religious right and the conservative political zealots have, that being gay is something to hide, to be ashamed of, and it's not.
We don't want to know the intimate details of Latifah's private life, but since she keeps wading into our lives -- appearing at Pride fests, officiating same-sex weddings -- the least she can do is come out.
|
There was a mass wedding at the Grammys - see the things I miss!!
ReplyDelete@TDM
ReplyDeleteand the wingnuts wingnutted.
stoopid wingnuts! no one was forcing them to watch the grammys.
ReplyDeleteI'd do lance bass if he batted for my team.
Hey, Tim Graham, some "traditional values" deserve to be mocked.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/01/thousands-pro-abortion-protesters-spain-madrid catholic church rearing its ugly head again; is the Mr Nice Guy act just an act?
ReplyDelete